INTEL RELEASES MOTHER-OF-ALL-FUD DOC

Page 19 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I said Intel and AMD chips don't directly affect this. You should really learn to READ.
And do you know what's an angle of incidenence? I'm surprised that such a smart ass doesn't mentions this.
 
I was being facetious, as in you all sound stupid by arguing about power comsuption and its affects on global warming. Or about global warming at all in a processor forum.

As far as what I know and what I don't, that's not for you to venture to guess. I did the whole high-end high school, I'm smarter than everyone thing years ago, but I grew out of it.
 
I'm not English and i can't use some native words properly in English(BTW do you know anything other than english nub?)
For starters
First faze : the sun sends energy
second faze:that energy is approaching earth
Some of it is used for heating the planet but not all of it.
A lot of unused energy should be getting back but it doesn't. Why,because
CO2 stops. It "absorbs" or keeps some of it.
That's causing this effect.
And no need to tell me about Mercury and Venus. Any two year old knows that.
Tell me on the spot all the eras known nub. I'm not in a very high-end high school for nothing. I know a lot more than that. Not that i spend all day learning BUT i need to learn unless i want to have problems with guess who. Don't get your wallet in a nut. Read first,ask questions later.

AGAIN, absorb does mean take it, but thats NOT what's happening. The co2 acts like a one-way mirror, letting heat through one way(in), but not back out. This is not absorbtion, but actually reflection. Absorbing would meant the c02 takes the heat for itself, which it doesn't.

lets see, from earliest to latest, off hand, well for ERAS which you specifically said, there was the paleozoic, mesozoic, and cenzoic. ACtually lets do ALL periods.

EONS-
PRECAMBRIAN(HADEAN,ARCHEAN,PROTOZOIC)
ERAS-HADEAN, ARCHEAN(EARLY,MIDDLE,LATE), PROTOZOIC(EARLY,MIDDLE,LATE)
PERIODS-NONE

EONS-
PHANEROZOIC
ERAS-PALEOZOIC, MESOZOIC, CENOZOIC
PERIODS-CAMBRIAN,ORDOVICAIN,SILURIAN,DEVONIAN,CARBONIFEROUS,PERMIAN, TRIASSIC,JURASSIC,CRETACIOUS,TERTIARY,QUATERNARY
EPOCHS-PALEOCENE,EOCENE,OLIGLICENE,MIOCENE,PLIOCENE,PLEISTOCENE,HOLOCENE

sorry, but i'd do it in chart form if i could, but i'm sure because you go to very high-end highschool, you'll understand. I'm not big on languages cause i'll never need it, but i know some frech and latin, which helps me understand lots of other languages. BTW, i didn't learn this at school, its called pick up a book. I'd rather pay $30 for a book, instead of 10 000 for private school and not learn much more. I do go to a good highschool, its the best in the region, maybe in the provance, but its free.
 
AM2 cant tweak out 20% extra performance (clock for clock), it would need a complete overhaul

even next year all it is is 65nm A64's and maybe more cache

amds are now hotter, slower and more expensive

Wow, it amazes me how many rash assumptions you intel fanboys make when it comes to your processors superiority.

Whether or not your processor is a tad bit faster would make no difference on how lame your life is away from your comp. If you get orgasmic like that about a processor thats not even available for true bench tests, you need to stop using that blowup Bill Gates doll, and go out and find some real sechs.

Tad Faster? Try between 20% and 50%
 
AM2 cant tweak out 20% extra performance (clock for clock), it would need a complete overhaul

even next year all it is is 65nm A64's and maybe more cache

amds are now hotter, slower and more expensive

Wow, it amazes me how many rash assumptions you intel fanboys make when it comes to your processors superiority.

Whether or not your processor is a tad bit faster would make no difference on how lame your life is away from your comp. If you get orgasmic like that about a processor thats not even available for true bench tests, you need to stop using that blowup Bill Gates doll, and go out and find some real sechs.

Tad Faster? Try between 20% and 50%
Yeah, who need +50% boost in FPS anyway? Psh...
 
AM2 cant tweak out 20% extra performance (clock for clock), it would need a complete overhaul

even next year all it is is 65nm A64's and maybe more cache

amds are now hotter, slower and more expensive

Wow, it amazes me how many rash assumptions you intel fanboys make when it comes to your processors superiority.

Whether or not your processor is a tad bit faster would make no difference on how lame your life is away from your comp. If you get orgasmic like that about a processor thats not even available for true bench tests, you need to stop using that blowup Bill Gates doll, and go out and find some real sechs.

Tad Faster? Try between 20% and 50%
Yeah, who need +50% boost in FPS anyway? Psh...

I told you stupid fanboys that conroe was rigged: http://voodoopc.blogspot.com/2006/03/if-only-they-had-time-machine.html

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
 
K lets sum it up:
1.You post this:
"yeah, maybe if you actually read some of the posts flaming him, instead of just looking for his, you'd understand. One intel fanboy even started attacking me over the definition of global warming, which i didn't even bring up, shows that they just pounce on any written words, that do not support intel in some way, they probably burn their mornig paper ifthere is no intel ad. BTW, i won the arguement. "
2.You flame for no reason
3.You have to pull your acts together

Reflection is very similar to what i use(the romanian for it is "reflectie")
and it means changing a ray of light's direction after reaching a very mirror like/polished surface. That's what happens, energy from the sun will be going back. That's what i call reflection. Some of the energy is vital for warming the planet. CO2 absorbs it, in that it prevents it from getting away(sheesh). I'd rather use one general word than a hole sentence. CO2 absorbing it <=> to atmosphere keeping some of the flux of energy
not the CO2 keeping heat for itself.

From the begining it was clear that you went theorising BUT not only you don't do that in a public forum,but also when you do it,you do it right.
As i said before you make no mention of angle of incidence whatsoever. If you'll be using "reflection" then why there is no mention of this? Look in a book,it's very closely connected.

I don't pay anything for going to the high school. And there i've studied (for free) :
romanian(native)/french/english/latin(yep. this is a dead language which i wouldn't have mention but i see you do) /german(that was in primary school).
Not to mention that romanian is very similar to italian(thus i can understand that to) or to most other latin languages. So what you do by chosing,i do because i have to and might i add i do a lot.

To end this,you do not theorise in a forum,nor do you act like a smart ass.
I can come up with a detailed insigt on this BUT doing that the people would get lost between the lines. The basic idea i was explaining is that the atmosphere(better said surface,between them there is an energy exchange called radioactive sum(?)) acts like a mirror with CO2 being small part of it that acts differently. The CO2 blocks energy from getting away.I'm ready to let the smart ass atitude behind if you do the same. You started it anyway which from the start means one point for me. You lost temper and used a poor man's words which means another point for me. See? I've already won.
P.S.The era names are correct. I learned them for an exam and never have forgotten them ever since.
 
wait, now its 50%, i thought it was 40, no 15, now i'm confused. If you contiue to exagerate your exagerations, it'll be 200% better by tomorrow :roll:

lol 300% by this afternoon 😉.

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
 
K lets sum it up:
1.You post this:
"yeah, maybe if you actually read some of the posts flaming him, instead of just looking for his, you'd understand. One intel fanboy even started attacking me over the definition of global warming, which i didn't even bring up, shows that they just pounce on any written words, that do not support intel in some way, they probably burn their mornig paper ifthere is no intel ad. BTW, i won the arguement. "
2.You flame for no reason
3.You have to pull your acts together

Reflection is very similar to what i use(the romanian for it is "reflectie")
and it means changing a ray of light's direction after reaching a very mirror like/polished surface. That's what happens, energy from the sun will be going back. That's what i call reflection. Some of the energy is vital for warming the planet. CO2 absorbs it, in that it prevents it from getting away(sheesh). I'd rather use one general word than a hole sentence. CO2 absorbing it <=> to atmosphere keeping some of the flux of energy
not the CO2 keeping heat for itself.

From the begining it was clear that you went theorising BUT not only you don't do that in a public forum,but also when you do it,you do it right.
As i said before you make no mention of angle of incidence whatsoever. If you'll be using "reflection" then why there is no mention of this? Look in a book,it's very closely connected.

I don't pay anything for going to the high school. And there i've studied (for free) :
romanian(native)/french/english/latin(yep. this is a dead language which i wouldn't have mention but i see you do) /german(that was in primary school).
Not to mention that romanian is very similar to italian(thus i can understand that to) or to most other latin languages. So what you do by chosing,i do because i have to and might i add i do a lot.

To end this,you do not theorise in a forum,nor do you act like a smart ass.
I can come up with a detailed insigt on this BUT doing that the people would get lost between the lines. The basic idea i was explaining is that the atmosphere(better said surface,between them there is an energy exchange called radioactive sum(?)) acts like a mirror with CO2 being small part of it that acts differently. The CO2 blocks energy from getting away.I'm ready to let the smart ass atitude behind if you do the same. You started it anyway which from the start means one point for me. You lost temper and used a poor man's words which means another point for me. See? I've already won.
P.S.The era names are correct. I learned them for an exam and never have forgotten them ever since.

Got any strawberries?

~~Mad mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
 
Cool’n’Quiet was disabled on the Athlon 64 FX-60 system. The FX-60 was overclocked to 2.8GHz at a 1.5V core voltage using a 14.0x multiplier, everything else remained at their defaults.

Some have tried to compare the results from these benchmarks to other results, using similar applications but different workloads. For example, our iTunes 6.0.1.3 test uses an input file that’s around 1/2 the size of the one Intel supplied us for these tests. The results in the game and encoding benchmarks are simply not comparable to anything outside of the two systems we have here. These results are not meant to be definitive indicators of performance, but rather a preview of what is to come.

http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2716&p=1
 
Cool’n’Quiet was disabled on the Athlon 64 FX-60 system. The FX-60 was overclocked to 2.8GHz at a 1.5V core voltage using a 14.0x multiplier, everything else remained at their defaults.

Some have tried to compare the results from these benchmarks to other results, using similar applications but different workloads. For example, our iTunes 6.0.1.3 test uses an input file that’s around 1/2 the size of the one Intel supplied us for these tests. The results in the game and encoding benchmarks are simply not comparable to anything outside of the two systems we have here. These results are not meant to be definitive indicators of performance, but rather a preview of what is to come.

http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2716&p=1

Got any strawberries?

~~Mad Mod Mike, pimpin' the world 1 rig at a time
 
No, Anandtech is a company too, Best is just to believe blogs which are controlled by no one and are always unbiased and just. You know as well as I that blogs are heavily regulated and guaranteed to be accurate.
 
No, Anandtech is a company too, Best is just to believe blogs which are controlled by no one and are always unbiased and just. You know as well as I that blogs are heavily regulated and guaranteed to be accurate.
Certainly! Opinions mean a thousand facts.
 
ok guys just stop just stop you cant beleive anything a company says
No, but you can believe anandtech which retested everything and found Conroe still conquered the FX60.. blah blah blah i am sick and tired of hearing all this intel bulls**t look conroe was tested agianst an older platform right? right but what if they tested it agianst am2 and f when they come out either conroe will match am2 or f will crush everything. did you look at the roadmap for f it say that f is going to have low power quadcore by 07!
 
ok guys just stop just stop you cant beleive anything a company says
No, but you can believe anandtech which retested everything and found Conroe still conquered the FX60.. blah blah blah i am sick and tired of hearing all this intel bulls**t look conroe was tested agianst an older platform right? right but what if they tested it agianst am2 and f when they come out either conroe will match am2 or f will crush everything. did you look at the roadmap for f it say that f is going to have low power quadcore by 07!
Haha, you're another tool who thinks DDR2 is going to fix all of AMD's problems. AMD will have to push clock speeds of AM2 out the ass to be competitive, removing the possibly of overclocking since 90nm tech has hit its limit. Also, the 2.66 Conroe is NOT the fastest Conroe nor is it the only Conroe to be innitially released. The 2.8ghz FX60 was more than a competitve platform by AMD, and it's not like AMD would have supplied an AM2 platform if called upon.
 

TRENDING THREADS