CEO and board member pay is a self dealing situation. The worst example is the Tesla board which is full of Musk's actual family and friends. Which is why his bonus package is so outrageous.
Board members are supposed to be independent and represent the will of the shareholders. But more often than not they have personal connections to each other outside of the company. Its how so many bad executives fail upwards.
Its a perfect example. The lawsuit about it proved the board didn't actually consider any metrics or other options. They just rubber stamped whatever Musk demanded without a 2nd thought. And it wasn't the first time either. Everyone always forgets that Musk used Tesla money to bail out his (and family) personal investment in the bankrupt SolarCity. Which Telsa then purchased at full value. Turning his worthless SolarCity shares into more Tesla shares.Musk's past bonuses were recently validated by a vote of the shareholders directly. I don't think Musk can be the worst example when he has made his shareholders crazy amounts of money. His outrageously high pay is arguably well worth it.
Independence of boards is an important part of corporate governance.
That's a backwards way of looking at it. Companies should pay their employees for retention and to incentivize them, not such extraordinary amounts as a sort of "thank you". The lawsuit alleged that the compensation package violated this basic logic. Well, I hope the shareholders get what they deserve.I don't think Musk can be the worst example when he has made his shareholders crazy amounts of money. His outrageously high pay is arguably well worth it.
Which is why it'd be nice if actually existed.Independence of boards is an important part of corporate governance.
https://jobs.intel.com/en/benefitsmeh... they should give them 50% discount on intel consumer products. I worked in many places where they offered employees factory product for near cost value .
Several years ago, an AMD employee explained to me how their employee discount worked. They would actually buy AMD products through normal retailers and then submit the receipt to their company's accounting department, which would reimburse them for I think like 20% of the total purchase price of the AMD products.meh... they should give them 50% discount on intel consumer products. I worked in many places where they offered employees factory product for near cost value .
One problem could be that they might not have installed coffee vending machines to replace the free coffee machines, in which case you'd have employees wasting lots of time by traveling much farther to get tea and coffee. If you have someone that makes $100k/year and works 2000 hours, the company is paying them $50/hour + benefits. Leaving benefits aside, taking 20 minutes per day longer coffee breaks should cost $16.67, which is more than 4 times what this benefit cost Intel.Are you seriously telling me spreading those 100 million a year by just increasing employee salary won't boost morale higher?
So they ported Jeoson Hell to the US but not Ghost and AG1 on tap? Odd.That's unfortunately the corporate world. The people up top making decisions they don't understand that benefits the company financially and them by extension most, not the workers. That will only get worse and has been.
(Maybe youre old enough) Remember when employees were valued, taken care of and had advancement opportunities? Those days are long gone. We might as well be wearing numbered jackets like in Squid Game
Neat to think of $$10B as coffee gouging territory (over 120k ppl, annually) but it's still unclear why Gelsinger is disheartened etc. Maybe sticking AVX512 back into consumer chips hit a roadblock or his daily affirmations for all the SKUs stopped being fun.No, $100 Million for the old food benefit, which was was more than just coffee.
And apparently Intel realized they were still being gouged, which is part of why they shut it down.
…and the complementary Joseon Escape (탈조선). I’d love to know where the 🎵 chairs are in a few years.ported Jeoson Hell to the US
That's a backwards way of looking at it. Companies should pay their employees for retention and to incentivize them, not such extraordinary amounts as a sort of "thank you". The lawsuit alleged that the compensation package violated this basic logic. Well, I hope the shareholders get what they deserve.
It also feeds into the whole cult of personality thing. Elon isn't the one who did all of the work to design and build Tesla's products. I'm not saying he didn't deserve to be well-compensated, but that package is completely out of proportion to his actual contributions.