Archived from groups: rec.games.computer.ultima.dragons (
More info?)
On Fri, 13 May 2005 17:36:05 +0100, "The Triad" <wanderer@beeb.web> wrote:
>"Cape Dweller" <usenet@ciotog.net> wrote in message
>news
😛an.2005.05.12.18.07.05.722700@ciotog.net...
>> From
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18624994.700 :
>>
>> "'Stimulating your brain with a reminder on a Blackberry doesn't seem that
>> different to me from stimulating your brain with a drug,' says Arthur
>> Caplan, a bioethicist at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia."
>>
>> Wow.
>
>*nods* I remember reading that article (in physical form)... I agree, /if/
>that's all that it seems.
>
>Ampakines... they sound promising, but also a little too good to be true.
>
>Give it a few decades. If they've passed all the tests without showing any
>negative side-effects--and particularly if I can look at their chemical
>structure and understand exactly what reaction they have on the body and
>brain--I might consider being less suspicious of them.
>
>Until then, though... better safe than sorry. *nods slightly* Look at all
>the similar drugs that have been produced and their negative side-effects
>only noticed later over the years/decades.
"It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the juice of Sapho
that thoughts acquire speed -- The lips acquire stains -- The stains
become a warning -- It is by will alone I set my mind in motion."
--
The Polychromic Dragon of the -=={UDIC}==-
http://home.comcast.net/~macecil/
http://home.comcast.net/~safehex/
RGCUD Photo Gallery: http://home.comcast.net/~rgcud/