Order 66
Grand Moff
I’m skeptical of the 5070s claim of parity with the 4090. Especially because of the slide that seemed to show the 5070 going from 27fps native with full rt to 230 fps with dlss 4.
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, they made all these claims with a lot of asterisks there.I’m skeptical of the 5070s claim of parity with the 4090. Especially because of the slide that seemed to show the 5070 going from 27fps native with full rt to 230 fps with dlss 4.
I’m skeptical of the 5070s claim of parity with the 4090. Especially because of the slide that seemed to show the 5070 going from 27fps native with full rt to 230 fps with dlss 4.
Yeah, they made all these claims with a lot of asterisks there.
Issue is games are requiring RT now it’s not just raster so you do actually need it.I would wait to see actual 3rd reviewers benchmarks before even thinking about the 9070 and 9070xt ..
Also there was a mention of that black ops 6 in that video which frank made that the numbers were not totally correct !!
The 7900xtx is still a banger of a card for its price point 24gb and trading blows with the 4080 in raster..
RT is a still a hot and miss system unless your in the 4090 eco system then almost everything you can play at 60fps 4K RT ultra.
Everything below needs DLSS or lower settings that nerf graphics anyway !!
I dont use RT because well to start the 7900xtx isnt very good and to be honest it doesnt hurt my gameplay experience by not using it so why do i actually need it ??
Seems suspicious. In my opinion it seems like a big jokeI’m skeptical of the 5070s claim of parity with the 4090. Especially because of the slide that seemed to show the 5070 going from 27fps native with full rt to 230 fps with dlss 4.
I mean, there is nothing to be suspicious about it - it is clear as day that what they meant is that if you slap on DLSS4 with Framegen x4, then the claim checks out.Seems suspicious. In my opinion it seems like a big joke
Yeah man, pretty muchI mean, there is nothing to be suspicious about it - it is clear as day that what they meant is that if you slap on DLSS4 with Framegen x4, then the claim checks out.
Otherwise, 5070 will at best be 4080 level, which usually is how it is going gen to gen give or take. Outside of DLSS4, which probably will be properly supported by less than a dozen games total, it's just business as usual really.
75 games at launch and all games that have DLSS 3 which haven’t been updated can be manually I overridden to 4 through the nvidia appI mean, there is nothing to be suspicious about it - it is clear as day that what they meant is that if you slap on DLSS4 with Framegen x4, then the claim checks out.
Otherwise, 5070 will at best be 4080 level, which usually is how it is going gen to gen give or take. Outside of DLSS4, which probably will be properly supported by less than a dozen games total, it's just business as usual really.
I imagine it will depend on a card in question.A flop? No. Impossible. It's NVIDIA's next gen GPU. The top cards will have a decent raster improvement (max of around 25% if NVIDIA's slides are correct) at an eye-watering price increase.
I just hated how they portrayed it. RTX 4090 performance from the 5070 is ridiculously misleading. I know that both Intel and AMD push this kind of hogwash with new product announcements too, but that doesn't make it ok to do so.
We'll see how much that 25% raster improvement holds up to the scrutiny of 3rd party reviewers when it's released. It may literally be in one game (FC6) whereas other games don't show more than a 15% increase. Maybe a bit pessimistic on my part - we'll see.
I feel Series 50 is 2 years too early for that party, and the food/booze ain't on the table yet.
Oh, for sure, whoever buys 5090 is probably well set for half a decade.I agree... but as I said in a previous comment... if Newegg is gonna give me $1350 trade for the 4090 I will bite on that deal and be happy with the 5090 for the next 4 years.