Is this configuration overkill?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Nicholas24

Reputable
Mar 19, 2014
61
0
4,630
This is my configuration:
Origin Millenium
Orientation: Standard
Standard Color: Black
Standby For FREE TITANFALL & More
Truly Custom PC's. Want a component that is not on our site? Call or email us and we will include it in your system.
Standard
Remote Controlled Multi-Colored LED
Corsair Air Series - Blue - ORIGIN PC Extreme Cooling Fan Setup
GIGABYTE GA-X79-UD3
ORIGIN FROSTBYTE 360 Sealed Liquid Cooling Systems
Intel Core i7 4820K Quad-Core 3.7GHz (3.9GHz TurboBoost)
1.3 Kilowatt EVGA Supernova 1300 G2
Triple 6GB NVIDIA GTX Titan Black
ORIGIN Professional Graphics Card Overclocking
16GB ORIGIN PC powered by HyperX 2133Mhz (2x8GB)
Genuine MS Windows 7 Home Premium 64-Bit Edition
2TB SATA 3.0Gb/s, 7200RPM, 32MB Cache
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
5 Bay Hot-Swap Cage
On Board Audio
Onboard Network Port
ORIGIN Wooden Crate Armor
1 Year Part Replacement and 45 Day Free Shipping Warranty with Lifetime Labor/24-7 Support
ORIGIN Recovery USB3.0 Flash Drive
No Part Upgrade Service
ORIGIN PC G8 T-Shirt XL
ORIGIN PC Dry Fit T-Shirt Small
ASUS 24" VS248H-P LED Monitor
Microsoft Internet Explorer

I feel that the processor is still under kill though, what's the speed difference between a 3.9GHz and 4.8GHz processor?

I've heard from many people that to get the full power from 3 GTX Titan Blacks, an X79 chipset is needed and an LGA2011 socket.
That's why such an overkill processor is needed. Besides, I'll be playing at 4K resolutions with everything maxed out and still achieving 60+ fps.

 
Solution


Looking at Benchmarks, even the FX8350 out performs the 4820 some times.

You are better off with the 4770K, seems to give better benchmark results at least.

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/63119-intel-i7-4930k-i7-4820k-ivy-bridge-e-review-9.html


SLI is only as...
Thing is, I'm not building a PC as it's too time-costly. It's a boutique PC and they don't really update their graphics card selection, so in this case, future-proofing would be the most logical thing to do
 


The future is your cell phone.

Small form factor, low power consumption, portable.

Future proofing = the flexibility to upgrade when needed, not to cement yourself in one place for the next decade.
 
There is really no such thing as futureproofing with modern parts.

Look at the i7 970. It came out and was a TANK. It cost an absurd amount of money, then BOOM a year or so later you could buy an i5 2500k for half the price and it performed better.

It is better to buy what you NEED and upgrade as time goes on as opposed to blowing thousands just to have it all be worthless in a short period of time.
 


This is exactly 100% correct. Having the ability to upgrade is what future proofing is all about. Not buying way overkill parts from the get go.
 




With what processor are you currently using?


There's no expected date for DX12. I'm going to wait myself, as I hear it's going to be a more low-level API and require less demand from the Procesor (hence why the best processor is most likely a waste). Mantal already proved this was possible.

Depending on the direction of Steam and how Windows 9 turns out, I may even migrate over the Linux in the next few years.
 


If you are uncomfortable doing something simple like adding a GPU or swapping RAM, you should DEFINITELY not be spending thousands on a custom computer.

This would be the same as buying a Ferrari and not even knowing how to change a tire.
 


It fits together like lego. If it doesn't fit, it doesn't belong. There really isn't that many parts in the case.
It's significantly easier than a car, and I'm not mechanic, but if it saves me $700, I have no problems figuring out how to replace the alternator in a 1986 Porsche.