So I got into a debate with a friend of mine, I told him the Intel CPU's and Nvidia GPU's are leading the performance stakes at the moment, he countered my argument saying NVIDIA reviews are paid off and biased and showed me the case of the 295x2.
I agreed that the x2 is faster than the Titan X but at the cost of much higher power draw and heat, and stated the maxwell architecture was significantly better than AMD since it gave similar performance at much lesser power and heat.
Then he got into Intel vs AMD as well, stating his system specs. This is the forward of the message he sent me, I felt most of it was inaccurate but then, having been out of the latest updates in the hardware world I felt its better to ask more up to date experts.
Please read the message and explain each of his arguments.
"Wat abt hyperthreading of nvidea is based on 16x geo thread. Means after 6 -7 yrs the nvidea will be broken as their specs wont increaded their memory upto 20gb ,low shaders ,vertex pixels too. where as amd uses a quadlam fx threader of 512x geo thread meaning their graphics can go upto 1024gb,with adaptive increasing pixel and shaders microsoft choose amd because of their hpyer architecture is several times better than others.if u can use a liquid coolet on a via /s3g card has the power to overcome both amd nd nvidea but they were financially bankcrupt amd is best for overclocking. And nvidea sucks
I am using advance a10 system dats enough to take down any graphics card if i can use 2600mhz x4 -16gb ram means a 2600mhz memory card costs 32000each meaning if i had making a 64gb ram system of 5200mhz for graphics dats way better than any graphics in the world and if i add 4 R9s and crossfire everyone of the graphics i can baet the ahit out of any graphs and if i disable my intergrated gpu then my cpu cores can reach upto 12cores making the best powerfull processor in the world -4ghz stock overclocked to6ghz and ppl wont dont do it bcos its too much
Nvidia is invalid graph card"
Thank you.
I agreed that the x2 is faster than the Titan X but at the cost of much higher power draw and heat, and stated the maxwell architecture was significantly better than AMD since it gave similar performance at much lesser power and heat.
Then he got into Intel vs AMD as well, stating his system specs. This is the forward of the message he sent me, I felt most of it was inaccurate but then, having been out of the latest updates in the hardware world I felt its better to ask more up to date experts.
Please read the message and explain each of his arguments.
"Wat abt hyperthreading of nvidea is based on 16x geo thread. Means after 6 -7 yrs the nvidea will be broken as their specs wont increaded their memory upto 20gb ,low shaders ,vertex pixels too. where as amd uses a quadlam fx threader of 512x geo thread meaning their graphics can go upto 1024gb,with adaptive increasing pixel and shaders microsoft choose amd because of their hpyer architecture is several times better than others.if u can use a liquid coolet on a via /s3g card has the power to overcome both amd nd nvidea but they were financially bankcrupt amd is best for overclocking. And nvidea sucks
I am using advance a10 system dats enough to take down any graphics card if i can use 2600mhz x4 -16gb ram means a 2600mhz memory card costs 32000each meaning if i had making a 64gb ram system of 5200mhz for graphics dats way better than any graphics in the world and if i add 4 R9s and crossfire everyone of the graphics i can baet the ahit out of any graphs and if i disable my intergrated gpu then my cpu cores can reach upto 12cores making the best powerfull processor in the world -4ghz stock overclocked to6ghz and ppl wont dont do it bcos its too much
Nvidia is invalid graph card"
Thank you.