Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (
More info?)
Orpheus wrote:
> > > > And apparently there was room for a few Group 3 Abominations.
> >
> > If 0 of this new clan was "full", then all group pairs
> (1/2,2/3,3/4,4/5,5/6,...)
> > would be "full". That hardly seems reasonable.
>
> Sure. OTOH this one has 2 SUP FoS disciplines, and a special to
match. He
> could very well have been a borderline setite (not sillier discipline
spread
> than many in every clan). So he'll probably make a good addition to
certain
> type (without Presence) of G2 or G4 FoS.
>
> In other words, make a FoS with this discipline spread in G3 wouldn't
have
> been any more disruptive (I know, he can't play their cards ; still,
the
> "perfect crypt" argument was mostly about disciplines, wasn't it ?).
>
> Just a remark...
> -------------
> Orpheus, G2 (compatible with Abominations ; should I rejoice ?)
One-up you, Orph. Think about it - the Ravnos was the only clan to get
7 new vamps instead of 6 new and one G2 Advancement. SO... maybe
another abomination with NEC and one more with QUI? But they won't
match perfectly, can't use those clans clan-specific stuff, and are
generally wierd enough not to screw up the 2/3 grouping too much, but
maybe lets group 4 get a little smaller (especially if there's a good
bit of synergy with these vamps) so that the odd/even groupings of the
indies can be rebalanced a little faster? Just a thought...
John