Marvell-Based SSDs From Corsair, Crucial, OCZ, And Plextor: Tested

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks Tom i picked me up two 128GB M4's and so far i am pretty impressed especially considering i bought mine for 109.99 a piece no tax at tigerdirect there also out of stock right now and i can only assume if they do re stock that price will go up
 
crucial FTW!
hmp.gif
 
Where are you guys seeing the 64GB M3 for $70? I have yet to find it anywhere for under $100. In fact, the best price I can find from reputable E-tailer is $120. I'd snap one up in a second as dedicated Intel SRT cache drive. @10TACLE where are you looking bro lol i don't know about M3 but i will assume that was a typo on your part if you meant the 64GB M4 i don't know where it at for 70 but you can get it at newegg for 80.99 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148441
 
One last thing i forgot to mention newegg is a awesome site but they switch prices allot a example the NH-D14 they change it price almost weekly and sometimes they put the price as high as 105.99 i don't know what's up with that but i find it shady so you have been warned lol don't get me wrong though it's a respectable trustworthy place to order from
 
Seeme like I'm the only one commenting who owns a Plextor M3 drive, and quite frankly it is fantastic. No BSOD's, no issues whatsoever. Upgraded firmware to 1.02, and it's a fantastic drive with the best warranty length. Plextor products have never let me down.
 
I have a crucial m4 64GB in my guest gaming rig, and a Corsair Force 3 180GB in my main rig. Both of them have not given me a single problem.
I did have an OCZ vertex 3 that died, and I RMA'd it. Then I sold the replacement to someone I don't like, so they can deal with the BS when it starts to fail.
My next SSD will be in the 240-256 GB range, and will come from either Crucial, Samsung, Plextor, or Intel.
 
I don't understand why the test was made without updating the Corsair M4 to the latest firmware (000F). It improves not only speed but stability.
 
[citation][nom]leopardtag[/nom]I don't understand why the test was made without updating the Corsair M4 to the latest firmware (000F). It improves not only speed but stability.[/citation]
I think you mean Crucial, mate. But mine won't update to 000F for some reason.
 
In the last 6 months we have deployed 18 M4 drives. In that time I've had 4 become unbootable (one before the 0309 firmware update, 3 after - and all 3 within 2 weeks of each other). The drives would work fine after secure wipe, or even just chkdsk /r; before sector wiping, they would report several thousand bad sectors (using chkdsk /r, but also various smartdisk utility scanners, etc.). After talking with Crucial tech support, they had the following suggestions since they don't have their own confidence test software/scan utility, smart disk monitor, etc.:

*Firmware needs to be greater than 0309, although this was done on 3 of the crashed drives before they became unbootable.
*They indicated that the default action of putting the drive to sleep during idle can cause the drive to lose information in memory but not committed to disk. I personally think this is bogus, I can't believe that Windows wouldn't power down a device without issuing a cache purge command; let alone a drive that was idle for 20 minutes wouldn't have done background cleanup of cache entries, but whatever, they indicated this could be a problem. Solution: set drive idle to "never" for battery and powered settings (not a big deal, SSDs don't consume much power when idle - just tech time to touch each system's config).
*They said that each drive ships with a certain amount of bad sectors out of the factory, that may or may not be picked up by the OS as part of formatting. The drives should be formatted, then scanned for bad sectors before put into use (chkdsk /r). Really? Why wouldn't sectors be remapped during (full, not quick) format or writing data to disk, let alone when we encrypt the drives?
*Having partitions that are not 4k aligned can cause excessive wear on the disks, turn off defrag scheduled task, etc. (this is true for all SSDs). That said, all drives that crashed already had this config.

I'm not really happy with this response - it indicates a lack of planning for default config for things like cache purging (who doesn't have caps that allow cache eviction on powerdown?) or good use of idle time - it's idle for 20 minutes before powerdown!

We'll be going with the Samsung 870/830 disks to see if we get better reliability for our drives. SF solution isn't a great choice since we encrypt the drives. We don't expect anyone will ship "perfect" drives, we would just be happy with sub 1%-2% failure rates.
 
Sehr gute Arbeit. Ich stolperte über einen Blog und wollte sagen, dass ich wirklich genossen Mitglieder in Ihrem Blog.new era pas cher
 
Status
Not open for further replies.