Memory type query

TKR99

Distinguished
Jun 20, 2011
8
0
18,510
NOT impressed 🙁 Spent ages typing in question only for forum software to lose it on me after making me sign in (refreshed page or switched it from question to discussion and then a blank box - even using my Back button didn't find it again :fou: :fou: !!!!) Only reason being I'm disabled so typing is painful.

Anyways - start again.

I have a FoxConn system as follows:

CPU: Core 2 Duo E7400 / 2x2.8GHz
RAM: 2 x 1 Gb RAM (Crucial DDR2 - 666 PC2-5300 )
MBD: Socket 775 MicroATX FOXCONN A6VMX
Network Adapter: Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller
Video Adapter: ATI Radeon X1200 Series (Microsoft Corporation - WDDM)
Onboard sound
3 x SATA drives - Seagate/Hitachi (2 x 250 & 1 x 120 - all apparently with no errors or problems)

I'd recently upgraded the memory to 4 Gb (2 x 2) Kingston sticks but had endless crashes - the 1st set of sticks went back to the shop and were tested, with 1 apparently faulty so both replaced but same problems happened again, so assumed the system just didn't like Kingston ones & rather than keep flogging a dead horse, I opted to just sell those on instead.

So what I'm looking to ascertain is, if a memory upgrade is likely to really improve the system over perhaps investing in a single but much larger HDD, or perhaps just working up to a new Mob instead? And if a memory upgrade, what sticks should I be looking to get that should actually be ok? I've a very limited budget though (UK £50 / $75-80) which doesn't help.

Any help/suggestions will be hugely appreciated.
THanks
TKR
Belfast, N. Ireland UK

 
Not 100% sure if that's exactly the same as mine's 2 years old and is no longer available through CCL where I got it, however, the RAM I'm using is what it came with. Manual just says it can take dual channel DDR 2 800/667/533 - the info I provided on the RAM in the system came from SiSoft Sandra so no idea why it should perhaps be off slightly (if it is). But the sticks are a matched set and I had done the same with the Kingston ones, yet it made little difference to the outcome. When I had the first set cause crashes we looked into everything possible hardware related and I updated pretty much everything I could manage to, yet nothing made any difference. But when the 2nd replacement set also caused similar crashes (either Driver errors or BSODs or just wouldn't load Windows at all) I could only assume it was because of either the make or the speed.

Hence my concern now - I really can't afford to invest in Crucial as they're a LOT more expensive unfortunately, but I would save up if I figured it might boost my system a bit more.

Being disabled I live on my PC 24/7 - used only primarly for email. browsing, webmaster work, & watching TV so nothing excessive in some respects, but I do tend to like having 4-6 apps open at any one point in time, and my Firefox is really loaded down with tabs etc, so things slow down a bit. Hard to change bad habits :pt1cable:

Are memory upgrades like this always very sensitive to preciseness i.e. it doesn't take much to make them useless?