Valantar :
So everything unnecessary is a bad thing? New GPU drivers, updated drivers for other hardware, and a load of other stuff (including minor bug fixes or fixes for specific issues not affecting a wide user base) don't necessarily qualify as "necessary," but are still very useful or could provide tangible benefits to users.
Having WU install drivers is an invitation to disaster. Who do you call for support when the MS diver breaks your system ? Within a week of Win10s release, WU broke SLI. Users let out a sigh of release when they reinstalled the driver from the nVidia site and everything worked again ... only to have WU remove the working driver and install the same sorry MS provided driver that continued breaking systems over and over again. Since when does a broken system qualify as a tangible benefit ? It's been a cavalcade of similar experience ever since.
There's a reason why 4 out of 5 people have declined to take advantage of MS's "free" offer to upgrade to their new OS and MS's increasingly aggressive tactics to force the issue over their own customers wishes is a confirmation of placing their own financial interests over the customer's well being.
HariboTer :
Could you kindly name such a source of information? I haven't found one yet and quite frankly woudln't know exactly what to search for
I follow this thread ... be aware that many folks are submitting list of what **they** have chosen not to install. This may include for example.... "This update eliminates an issue with Linksys routers...." and since they didn't have one, it's on **their** list of things not to install.
http://www.sevenforums.com/windows-updates-activation/367377-how-remove-windows-10-upgrade-updates-windows-7-8-a.html
HotDog800 :
Slightly incorrect / misleading statement in this article. If you have been keeping your win 7/8 system up-to-date, then you are not "going to wake up one morning to your bandwidth being hogged". This has happened months ago, even if you have declined the upgrade months ago over and over again. Microsoft downloaded windows 10 onto your system already and has stored it in a hidden folder at root level (C:\). This is to "make the update process as quick and pain free as possible".
Incorrect in several ways:
1. It is possible top keep your "win 7/8 system up to date" w/o installing Win 10 is not part of Win 7/8.
2. Unless you blindly give access to let MS install whatever it likes, Win 10 folders will not be on your system.
3. No boxes which I administer have a single folder or file associated with Win 10. GWX Control panel confirms this.
4. Yes it is to "make the process as quick and pain free as possible" ... for them. Do you know how MS gets those files onto those that leave the door open for this invasion ? By using YOUR bandwidth. Win10 turns your PC into a torrent like server so they can ease the burden on their own servers and cut their costs accordingly. Those that are having those files installed right now are downloading them from YOUR computer.
https://www.grahamcluley.com/2015/08/windows-10-bandwidth-updates/
HotDog800 :
As "IT professionals", the best option for a client is to always update to Windows 10. Your job is to show them the benefits, and help ease them into it, and train them on the charges - equipping them for their continued use of their system. The ONLY time an upgrade is not advised is if they have critical software that is legacy and will not work on Windows 10. In this case, stressing that they need to look for alternatives to the software needs to be made a priority.
IT Professionals make money from upgrades so yes, of course they ... or at least many of then recommend upgrades at every opportunity. InfoWorld reported that when corporate America moved from W4WGS to Win95 they spent between $2500 and $4500 per box in hardware, training and downtime.... all to get machines that were now 40% slower.
Other IT professionals have a business model which is bit crazier ,,, that is to focus on the needs of their clients. There is nothing that Win10 has to offer the user ... the push here is simply to create a huge income stream for MS.
Look at this w/o the blinders on ... we have a product that has been available for almost 10 months that you claim has all these wonderful benefits .... and yet 4 out of 5 people eligible for the upgrade have declined to do so. There's obviously something wrong with this picture.
holt8137 :
Windows 10 is all fine and dandy until you have a $10,000 wide format scanner who's maker refuses to update the driver to support Windows 10.... Execs at M$ should be shot for trying to sneak Win10 where it's not wanted.
Neat business model isn't it ? Why should they ? You buy the new model, they get another $10k ... I'm in the same boat w/a $15k plotter and $12k MFP.
everygamer :
Who cares, at this point Windows 10 is better than Vista and 7, might as well just upgrade. At some point the other ones are not going to be supported anymore with patches and you'll have to pay to upgrade to windows 10, might as well do it for free
In what quantifiable way ? ... the idea of taking existing hardware and putting a newer OS on it has no ROI. Win 95 was 40% slower than its predecessor. Win 8 was supposed to be faster than Win 7, testing proved otherwise. And despite your claims, Windows 7 will be supported thru 2020.
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/lifecycle
By the time Win 7 support runs out, Windows 10 will be 5 years old.