Microsoft: HP Gets Another Year of XP

Status
Not open for further replies.

chise1

Distinguished
Apr 5, 2008
52
0
18,630
Hmmm, HP gets to continue selling PC's with a Windows XP downgrade option, and the latest Microsoft commercials both have their protagonists choosing HP computers in the end... Coincidence?
 

Greatwalrus

Distinguished
Feb 3, 2009
108
0
18,680
Yeah, I bet this is some ploy to up relations with HP so they will stop selling Linux with their PCs :p

By the way, how about a Windows XP 2.0, Microsoft?
 

thedipper

Distinguished
Mar 3, 2009
97
0
18,630
[citation][nom]GreatWalrus[/nom]Yeah, I bet this is some ploy to up relations with HP so they will stop selling Linux with their PCs By the way, how about a Windows XP 2.0, Microsoft?[/citation]
They already answered the need for XP 2.0, it's Win7.

No great feats of engineering with a good bit of UI polish = XP revisited.
 

joex444

Distinguished
Ugh... this is so stupid. 8 year old OS instead of Windows 7? I can only imagine one reason to choose that: stubborn. You've learned XP and understand it. You're afraid of change and fear Windows 7. You never actually tried Vista and fear it based on "rumors" from its early days where nVidia drivers were poorly written. Honestly, some of the complaints I've seen for Vista are just user ignorance. Hate UAC? Turn it off; sure, it offers no protection, but its not less secure this way than your beloved XP. Don't like where they put the menu items... sorry, just adapt it won't take long. Don't see a "run" option? Hit Windows+R or hell, just enable it on the start menu options. Laugh at these examples? They were part of an article explaining why Vista is so bad posted on C|Net / ZDNet. This is where people get their information from folks, and if they're reading this junk then they probably believe it and will choose XP over Vista. I'll grant that XP is a bit faster, but in 2009 we have dual core 4GB systems as entry level, with quad core 8GB being more in line with what most THG users probably have. How slow could one OS be on this hardware to make you absolutely hate it and want XP? The difference is measured in ms, and in games we're talking 1-2 fps. You can tell the difference between 57.8 and 59.2fps? Really?

Hopefully Windows 7 will let us move on. This XP vs Vista debate has gone on far too long and the large base of stubborn XP users has impeded progress / change. Fact of the matter is Microsoft rewrote its kernel, hence why drivers needed to be rewritten. You can't deny that every software company is writing programs to run on Vista and Windows 7. You're stuck in XP, it won't be long before programs have to be released in two stages: Windows 7 first, then XP.

Plus, if you're running more than 4GB you need XP x64. The driver situation here is actually worse than Vista x64. You don't get any compatibility points for XP x64.

 

thedipper

Distinguished
Mar 3, 2009
97
0
18,630
XP actually hasn't been faster in Vista since SP1, and a lot of the comparison charts were false. Vista is actually faster in certain situations.
 

theJ

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2009
104
0
18,710
[citation][nom]joex444[/nom]Ugh... this is so stupid. 8 year old OS instead of Windows 7? I can only imagine one reason to choose that: stubborn.[/citation]

I admit i'm one of the stubborn, though it's actually more because my laptop was purchased in 2005, and wouldn't run Vista with any sort of speed.

I switched to Ubuntu a few months ago on that PC, and am holding off on getting another computer until Windows 7 has been out for a while (maybe 2nd quarter next year) and has proven to be the next "XP".

I think many people simply don't want to switch over because they don't see Vista lasting. Who would want to buy an operating system that is going to be obsolete within 3 months? Personally, when i build my next computer, i don't want to have to worry about upgrading the OS within the life of the machine.
 

thedipper

Distinguished
Mar 3, 2009
97
0
18,630
He didn't mean people should move to Vista now, he means that most people should have moved to Vista about a year ago.
 

hellwig

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
1,743
0
19,860
joex444, do you work for Microsoft, do you get a commission for every XP user you turn over to Vista? Why do you care what OS people use? My biggest problem with Vista is that I don't see any reason to pay $200+ for it. It was bad enough I paid $200 for a Windows XP Pro Upgrade License 6 years ago (when I finally moved to XP), but XP is a world apart from Windows Millenium Edition. Vista isn't that much of an improvement over XP, especially if you turn off Aero and disable UAC (you take away its fancy graphics and security).
 

hixbot

Distinguished
Oct 29, 2007
818
0
18,990
Corporations and government want XP machines, whether their machines are brand new or 5 years old. There is demand for XP on new hardware. This has nothing to do with home users or gamers. We're talking Microsofts biggest customers, office users.
 

theJ

Distinguished
Mar 20, 2009
104
0
18,710
[citation][nom]thedipper[/nom]He didn't mean people should move to Vista now, he means that most people should have moved to Vista about a year ago.[/citation]

But again, why would you move if the talk is generally negative? What's the incentive? You have a good OS in XP already. And in the past, when an OS is not well received, it doesn't last very long. Why buy a new OS if you know you've got to upgrade it again within the life of the machine?
 

pharge

Distinguished
Feb 23, 2009
464
0
18,780
I am ok w/ the VISTA home prem on my laptop (C2D T7500 2.2GHZ 2G memory and 8400M GS). I like the small goodies in the vista and I am defintely having less blue screen of death (my programs still crash just less crash in the system level).
However the price I paid...
1) even w/ C2D 2.2G and 2G RAM, my new laptop is not significant faster than my old one or even my old Athlon desktop w/ xp (I know it is not fair to compair desktop and laptop..... but lower than an old athlon + AGP graphic card + xp system on DX8 games (for example: Final Fantasy XI)... that is a little too much for me).
2) I can not play some of my old favorate games on my vista system (sush as Railroad tycon III) even with some twist.
I agree that vista is not as bad as people are talking about. However, for people who have a not so perfect system or expect to have a big big profermance jump from an old xp system to a new C2D vista on some old DX8 games... they may be disappointed.

By the way: "according to an article over on AppleInsider, Microsoft generously granted the PC giant an extension to its current Windows XP rights beyond that July 31 termination date. "... a microsoft vista news from the "AppleInsider"?? hmm... that is an interesting source of information... wondering how people think about vista there? guess kind of different than us here.. :p ..lol
 

the_one111

Distinguished
Aug 25, 2008
390
0
18,780
The only reason (IMO) MS made Windows 7 is because vista got so much bad hype from the ignorant teeming masses that they said "Hell, we will release a new OS, with all the new features of vista, and some even newer ones. Wrap that up with some fancy graphics and its GG!"

Which is true.

*patiently awaiting windows 7*
 

rooket

Distinguished
Feb 3, 2009
1,097
0
19,280
I don't like the vista file explorer. Windows XP feels a lot easier to use and I know where everything is in it right away. Vista just seemed to downgrade the user interface experience although it has spiffy stuff such as Aero.
 

pharge

Distinguished
Feb 23, 2009
464
0
18,780
[citation][nom]the_one111[/nom]The only reason (IMO) MS made Windows 7 is because vista got so much bad hype from the ignorant teeming masses that they said "Hell, we will release a new OS, with all the new features of vista, and some even newer ones. Wrap that up with some fancy graphics and its GG!"Which is true.*patiently awaiting windows 7*[/citation]

I still remember the hype people has before MS releasing vista...

Now I can not help to think what will people think about win7 this time next year or 2.

Hope Win7 final version is going to be as good as they promis (or at least not too far from they promis now).
 

plbyrd

Distinguished
Jun 10, 2008
60
0
18,630
"Keeping Windows XP is definitely a good thing, "

No, it is not. XP is far more likely to be hacked than Vista and doesn't include critical security features other than UAC such as user-mode drivers. It's disingenuous for any tech to try to prop up XP over Vista, it's really just a matter of doing anything they can to whip on Vista publicly despite the fact that Vista's growing pains are far behind it.

And let's not forget the chilling effect that XP has on hardware. With XP Pro 32-bit, there's no incentive at all to include more than 4GB or RAM nor include a DX 10 graphics solution. Microsoft is doing a real disservice to the entire industry by allowing the fear-mongerers to continue to publicly subvert the entire market so they can get their jollies undermining Vista.
 

grieve

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2004
2,709
0
20,790
[citation][nom]rooket[/nom]I don't like the vista file explorer. Windows XP feels a lot easier to use and I know where everything is in it right away. Vista just seemed to downgrade the user interface experience although it has spiffy stuff such as Aero.[/citation]
I have used Vista Ultimate64 since the day it was released…

I have much experience with the Vista file system (not saying you don’t) and I agree, I do like XP’s file system better then Vista’s. I think it is something that worked well and did not require changes.

I always defend Vista to everyone, I like it… But I also still have dual boot XPpro32 just in case. I look forward to Win7, perhaps I can run just one OS finally.

 

vaskodogama

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2008
114
0
18,680
I Really Patiently Waiting for 7, like I waited for Vista, and Love it from the first day of using it...
If you like, thumb me down, but it's time to move on to something new, OK, vista is a failure, like Win ME, but come on, XP is an old dog! you can do maths even with a abacus [XP], but will you when you have something far more advanced like a Digital Calculator [Win7]?
MS must not give another company a 1 YEAR XP downgrade option!
 

grieve

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2004
2,709
0
20,790
[citation][nom]vaskodogama[/nom]I Really Patiently Waiting for 7, like I waited for Vista, and Love it from the first day of using it...If you like, thumb me down, but it's time to move on to something new, OK, vista is a failure, like Win ME, but come on, XP is an old dog! you can do maths even with a abacus [XP], but will you when you have something far more advanced like a Digital Calculator [Win7]?MS must not give another company a 1 YEAR XP downgrade option![/citation]
I agree completely… XP is an old dog, time for something new already.

However, I do believe Vista’s low acceptance is based on ignorance not fact.
 
G

Guest

Guest
I have not seen a reason to update to Vista.

What real benefit do you receive?DX10?A shiny new interface?Great networking "features"?

Microsoft know how to make money and that is to release new products making the old ones obsolete.

XP is fast and stable, and gives me everything that I want in a gaming OS... for now! After working all day on computers it is nice to come home and just know where everything is. Personally I would rather put effort into developing my next Linux project server rather than waste time trying to figure out where MS has moved all the buttons and icons to this time. :)



 

belardo

Splendid
Nov 23, 2008
3,540
2
22,795
However, I do believe Vista’s low acceptance is based on ignorance not fact.

However, your "beliefs" are based on your opinions, not facts.

XP > Vista issue is not the same as Win98 > XP. Win98 was MS's first consumer GUI OS. XP, based off of Win2000 is a different beast. There was never a question that XP was better than Win98. Its issues we more to do with things like Activation (still hate it) and privacy (Worse on vista and Win7).

XP is old, whoopie. OS X is still OLDER than XP, yet still more polished than XP or Vista. If you think about it, XP-MCE is a nice update (Vista looks a bit like MCE).

And besides, you and any other MS-Vista cry-baby (I know some of you guys work for MS and/or worked on vista) go nuts if anyone says one neg about vista... guess what. YOU DON'T own me or the companies who bought their computers. Its their bloody choice, its their money. And with Win7 coming around the corner (along with a new Office), that'll be the time to go from XP to something new... another 6 months isn't going to kill me or anyone else! Thanks to vista (but also crappy economy) memory is dirt cheap (4GB $20~30) X2 CPUs are $50~100, X3 CPUs are $100 so making a bloated OS like vista (and Win7) run well shouldn't be a problem.

At this time... there if someone TODAY is still using an XP box and buying or building a new PC - they should go ahead and get it with XP (today) if they want to and move to Win7 later...

For most home users, vista should be fine. $350~400 gets you a dual core AMD with 3GB of RAM... enough to check your email.
 

gto127

Distinguished
Jan 8, 2008
158
0
18,680
Why doesn't Microsoft just redo windos XP with the same user interface, slightly enchanced look,better security,directX10 & call it windows XPII. Everyone can use it & Microsoft makes more money. Then everyone's happy.
 

thepinkpanther

Distinguished
Nov 24, 2004
289
0
18,780
i dont think alot of people hate vista because of ignorance, cause they have actually used it. Better security? when is it a good idea to store credit card number in ur pc? I have tried many times to switch, and i am still trying. I did alot of tweaks to make vista faster. And creative sound cards are crap on vista. Programming is a pain in the @$$ too, i kept saving a file with .xul extension, i thought everything was going well until it didnt work. i moved to my XP (duel boot) and saw that vista had saved the .xul extention as a text file, "file.xul.txt" Thats what i get for spending 3 hours thinking i programmed something wrong? and it was all cause of vista? At my work the boss had gotten around 40 pcs with vista home premium, when he tried to hook them up to a network they couldnt cause some feature wasnt supported in premium for networking ( i forgot the exact problem) he then had to upgrade all pc's to business... U know problems that never existed with xp came with vista, and it always made the user feel stupid cause he did all the right steps.
 

belardo

Splendid
Nov 23, 2008
3,540
2
22,795
Home versions of XP and Vista support a limited amount of connected computers. XP-PRO, Vista-business, Win7-Pro are needed.

Your boss should have ordered XP-Pro if the purchase was recent. And whoever sold your boss 40 PCs didn't know what they were doing.

GTO127: WinXP needs to be replaced... Vista just offered so little, but its bloatness has made 64bit computing a standard, especially for Win7. I like XP-MCE because it has a nice glassy look (Vista is a black vesion of MCE)... and yes, MS could have been doing face-lifts for XP-core and I think we'd all be just as happy as long as the thing didn't break. Vista broke a lot of stuff for stupid reasons for little gains. DX10 could have worked just fine for XP, if they chose to... funny, DX9 works perfectly well on Win98 as it does on XP... hmmmm.

If Vista was soooooo good, then XP should have been put out the pastor within 6~9 months after vista came out. But here is XP, extended again.

If Win7 blows (which I doubt and hope its usable), I can use XP fine for the next 4 years... it doesn't really make much difference.
 

smalltime0

Distinguished
Apr 29, 2008
309
0
18,780
[citation][nom]pharge[/nom]I am ok w/ the VISTA home prem on my laptop (C2D T7500 2.2GHZ 2G memory and 8400M GS). I like the small goodies in the vista and I am defintely having less blue screen of death (my programs still crash just less crash in the system level). However the price I paid... 1) even w/ C2D 2.2G and 2G RAM, my new laptop is not significant faster than my old one or even my old Athlon desktop w/ xp (I know it is not fair to compair desktop and laptop..... but lower than an old athlon + AGP graphic card + xp system on DX8 games (for example: Final Fantasy XI)... that is a little too much for me). 2) I can not play some of my old favorate games on my vista system (sush as Railroad tycon III) even with some twist.I agree that vista is not as bad as people are talking about. However, for people who have a not so perfect system or expect to have a big big profermance jump from an old xp system to a new C2D vista on some old DX8 games... they may be disappointed.By the way: "according to an article over on AppleInsider, Microsoft generously granted the PC giant an extension to its current Windows XP rights beyond that July 31 termination date. "... a microsoft vista news from the "AppleInsider"?? hmm... that is an interesting source of information... wondering how people think about vista there? guess kind of different than us here.. ..lol[/citation]
Im telling you now, I know as a fact RRT III runs perfectly well on a vista system, I have it running on 3
Your doing something wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS