[citation][nom]photoguru[/nom]Economic policies that the government passes take a few years to make an impact... so the whole "this president had surplus and that president had debt" doesn't really make a ton of sense. Arguing on the actual programs or economic decisions themselves is a measurable argument because you can see the outcome of each individually.Truth is... the U.S. is in waaayyy too much debt, and our current policies that are being passed will only push us further down. Sometimes I wonder if our government now assumes that we will be less likely to be targeted if we destroy ourselves instead[/citation]
Disclaimer: Libertarian, so I think both you elephants and donkeys are full of it. Anyway...
Statements like this just drive me nuts. Right now, if one was to watch fair and balanced coverage, you'd hear that the deficit problems right now are all Obama's fault but anything good during the Clinton years were because "economic policies take time to implement". So the good stuff during the end of the Clinton years was merely the delayed results of Reagan's policies but the current bad stuff is Obama and not Bush. So, if I understand it correctly, if something good happens with the deficit it's republicans, but if it's bad it's democrats regardless of when or what actually happens. Reminds me of John Oliver's bit on "Terror-Ball".
Anyway, good for MS, I like win 7. I get a little grumpy sometimes when I try to find something in the Control Panel, luckily I know how to access most anything using Run...