anamaniac
Distinguished
[citation][nom]jsloan[/nom]adding WolframAlpha is great idea...i wonder why google has not innovated of late... why didn't they make a deal with WolframAlpha. appears being #1 has made them narcistic .microsoft + yahoo + WolframAlpha should give google should be an interesting fight...microsoft should look to partner with dictionary.com as well. won't hurt to add a bunch of references. so people can do define narcistic and it will tell you what it is...ive tried WolframAlpha when it first came out, while very powerful I found it of limited use to the kind of srearches that i do. regards to Bing, I've changed my default search to it because I got tired of all the junk google comes up with. It works for the most part, but from time to time it does not come up with anything and I have to resubmit my search to google.[/citation]
Yeah, what has Google been up to?
Though, Bing + Yahoo + WolframAlpha actually has a chance of defeating Google if they play their cards right.
[citation][nom]IronRyan21[/nom]I liked wolfram, it gives you encyclopedia type answers and comparisons. I had fun searching given names and surnames etc..[/citation]
It is fun.
I used it a bit for my calculus also.
Plus it has a few Monty Python refrences.
WolframAlpha certainly needs more wok, but so far, I like it.
Yeah, what has Google been up to?
Though, Bing + Yahoo + WolframAlpha actually has a chance of defeating Google if they play their cards right.
[citation][nom]IronRyan21[/nom]I liked wolfram, it gives you encyclopedia type answers and comparisons. I had fun searching given names and surnames etc..[/citation]
It is fun.
I used it a bit for my calculus also.
Plus it has a few Monty Python refrences.
WolframAlpha certainly needs more wok, but so far, I like it.