[citation][nom]bllue[/nom]I hate to pull the "have you even used it?" card but I have to. Really, have you used it at all?. No you're NOT forced to use the UI. I, in fact, spend 97% of my time in desktop mode. To say W8 is worse than vista just makes you look ignorant because this OS has already been proven to perform better than W7 (maybe not for gaming but overall it is). It's nowhere near what Vista was at launch. If you like start menu there are alternatives to bring it back, but I personally only ever used the old start menu to open control panel and everything else is done via keyboard shortcuts so this is a non-issue for me. I got W8 because it was a cheap upgrade but I really think people like you exaggerate wayyy too much. Much like the old start menu, MS will look at the data once again and realize that not many people on desktops use the new 'start' menu and will hopefully come up with something new and better to replace it for W9.[/citation]
I HAVE tried windows 8 and I found it a joke, all they have done is take the exact same function that the start menu provided oversized it and made it a annoying instead of keeping it simple, fast and easy like it use to be, also the main reason windows 8 isn't as bad as vista when vista 1st launched is because its based on the windows 7 build just with a rebuilt interface that's 100x worse. As a consumer we don't want to have to rely on 3rd party software just to bring back the start menu which shouldn't of been removed in the 1st place, it was stupid and pointless to take away the start menu a system that allows you to access all of your programs, settings and other things you want with ease and a few clicks of the mouse. instead your having to learn and memorize a whole new bunch of different shortcut keys to do the exact same thing,
windows 8 wasn't even needed or asked for by the people that matter most.... the consumers all over the world, windows 7 was doing fine and didn't need replacing and is still the best windows based operating system you can buy hence why its not at a stupid low special offer price (even if its only the upgrade versions) unlike windows 8.
As many people have stated windows 8 is ideal for tablets or smartphones but on desktop platform it just not needed or wanted by the majority of consumers, I believe micro$oft only created windows 8 to generate more revenue and did a piss poor job (in comparison to what they could of created if they listened to the people) along the way.
Thanks