[citation][nom]smile9999[/nom]are you an idiot man, they are trying to dictate what the direction should be for the hardware industry, they should keep with the software which they seem to be failing at honestly with this weird ideas.[/citation]
How can you say they are failing at this idea when it hasn't even been released yet?
Also if the PC industry didn't have a universalised adoption of the IBM compatible clone which *every* PC in the world uses, we would have fragmentation of the worst kind where each company make everything proprietary. First it was Windows as the OS, over time we have seen everything else become standardised including the 3.5" hard disk, ATA connectors, PCI ports, VGA, USB - the list goes on. Of course now the hardware standards no longer require Windows as Linux installs on any PC hardware and even Apple use PC componants such as RAM, CPU, HDD. If we want to be really pedantic you could say that IBM were the first people to bring universal standardisation by creating the IBM PC, but it was Windows that put a box into every home.
This fugly looking box up there isn't trying to replace anything, it will be just another option for people to install Windows 8 on, there isn't even the remotest chance in hell that Microsoft will make their own hardware Windows 8 exclusive because the business world's PC refresh cycle wouldn't be able to syncronise and they would lose billions, possibly even go bust. Microsoft isn't in the business of losing money, it is in the business of winning and the best way to do that is to have broad market spectrum diversification, specialisation for those that want it and standardisation for those that need it, and for every fugly box they sell with Windows 8 pre-installed they will still sell 100 other copies of Windows 8 installed on a Dell on volume licence to a financial company.