MiniDV camera questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    VGA
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

I am in the market for a 3ccd MiniDV cam but I want one that
shoots 16:9. Should I look for a camera that has this as a
native aspect ratio or do cameras like the VX2000 do a
respectable job of this? What are some other cameras that I
should consider?

I have been looking for a web site that has a forum or
discussion of MiniDV cams but most that I have found are more
a marketing ploy than an objective discussion of merits of
various cameras. Is there a site that does this?

Thanks!

fyb

--
This is my sig
 
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

Lord and Master wrote:
> I am in the market for a 3ccd MiniDV cam but I want one that
> shoots 16:9. Should I look for a camera that has this as a
> native aspect ratio or do cameras like the VX2000 do a
> respectable job of this? What are some other cameras that I
> should consider?
>
> I have been looking for a web site that has a forum or
> discussion of MiniDV cams but most that I have found are more
> a marketing ploy than an objective discussion of merits of
> various cameras. Is there a site that does this?
>
> Thanks!
>
> fyb


www.camcorderinfo.com is a decent site with a lot of reviews.

Mike
 
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

Lord and Master <fybar@babs.hammerdog.org> wrote in message news:<slrncpon84.4go.fybar@babs.hammerdog.org>...
> I am in the market for a 3ccd MiniDV cam but I want one that
> shoots 16:9. Should I look for a camera that has this as a
> native aspect ratio or do cameras like the VX2000 do a
> respectable job of this? What are some other cameras that I
> should consider?
>
> I have been looking for a web site that has a forum or
> discussion of MiniDV cams but most that I have found are more
> a marketing ploy than an objective discussion of merits of
> various cameras. Is there a site that does this?
>
> Thanks!
>
> fyb

For a website try www.dvinfo.net

Most cameras/editing software can do 16:9 in some form or fashion. I
believe that the professional Sony PDX10 camera has a native 16:9
format - not sure about its prosumer cousin the Sony TRV950.
dvinfo.net has some extensive discussions on both topics.
 
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

I believe the VX2000 has what could be more aptly described as "pseudo-16:9
ratio". So I would look into that first, and I think I'd look at the most
current models available.
Steve S.


"Lord and Master" <fybar@babs.hammerdog.org> wrote in message
news:slrncpon84.4go.fybar@babs.hammerdog.org...
> I am in the market for a 3ccd MiniDV cam but I want one that
> shoots 16:9. Should I look for a camera that has this as a
> native aspect ratio or do cameras like the VX2000 do a
> respectable job of this? What are some other cameras that I
> should consider?
>
> I have been looking for a web site that has a forum or
> discussion of MiniDV cams but most that I have found are more
> a marketing ploy than an objective discussion of merits of
> various cameras. Is there a site that does this?
>
> Thanks!
>
> fyb
>
> --
> This is my sig
 
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

On 18 Nov 2004 11:10:56 -0800, h2oski64@hotmail.com (Kelvin) wrote:

>Lord and Master <fybar@babs.hammerdog.org> wrote in message news:<slrncpon84.4go.fybar@babs.hammerdog.org>...
>> I am in the market for a 3ccd MiniDV cam but I want one that
>> shoots 16:9. Should I look for a camera that has this as a
>> native aspect ratio or do cameras like the VX2000 do a
>> respectable job of this? What are some other cameras that I
>> should consider?
>>
>> I have been looking for a web site that has a forum or
>> discussion of MiniDV cams but most that I have found are more
>> a marketing ploy than an objective discussion of merits of
>> various cameras. Is there a site that does this?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> fyb
>
>For a website try www.dvinfo.net
>
>Most cameras/editing software can do 16:9 in some form or fashion. I
>believe that the professional Sony PDX10 camera has a native 16:9
>format - not sure about its prosumer cousin the Sony TRV950.
>dvinfo.net has some extensive discussions on both topics.

The software solution will loose significant resolution (You'll
basically be tossing 20% off the top and 20% off the bottom to mask it
into 16:9), but is the cheapest way forward.

http://gregl.net/videophile/anamorphic.htm

Or you can pick up a lens that presents a 16:9 image anamorphically to
a standard DV camera, so it would be possible to master a DVD with no
loss of resolution, like this one:

http://www.zgc.com/zgc.nsf/0/63b83c97fd349a1785256b82005afb3b?OpenDocument

or this one:

http://www.centuryoptics.com/products/dv/16x9/16x9_37mm.htm

(Google for 'Anamorphic DV lens')

--
Owamanga!
 
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

In article <pi1qp09870b1omsjfdcnka4un2g4rj473t@4ax.com>,
nomail@hotmail.com says...
> The software solution will loose significant resolution (You'll
> basically be tossing 20% off the top and 20% off the bottom to mask it
> into 16:9), but is the cheapest way forward.
>
> http://gregl.net/videophile/anamorphic.htm
>
> Or you can pick up a lens that presents a 16:9 image anamorphically to
> a standard DV camera, so it would be possible to master a DVD with no
> loss of resolution, like this one:
>
> http://www.zgc.com/zgc.nsf/0/63b83c97fd349a1785256b82005afb3b?OpenDocument
>
> or this one:
>
> http://www.centuryoptics.com/products/dv/16x9/16x9_37mm.htm
>
> (Google for 'Anamorphic DV lens')
>
> --
> Owamanga!
>

Do these lenses actually give you a wider field of view?
--
_________________________
Chris Phillipo - Cape Breton, Nova Scotia
http://www.ramsays-online.com
 
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:17:01 GMT, Chris Phillipo
<cphillipo@ramsays-online.com> wrote:

>In article <pi1qp09870b1omsjfdcnka4un2g4rj473t@4ax.com>,
>nomail@hotmail.com says...
>> The software solution will loose significant resolution (You'll
>> basically be tossing 20% off the top and 20% off the bottom to mask it
>> into 16:9), but is the cheapest way forward.
>>
>> http://gregl.net/videophile/anamorphic.htm
>>
>> Or you can pick up a lens that presents a 16:9 image anamorphically to
>> a standard DV camera, so it would be possible to master a DVD with no
>> loss of resolution, like this one:
>>
>> http://www.zgc.com/zgc.nsf/0/63b83c97fd349a1785256b82005afb3b?OpenDocument
>>
>> or this one:
>>
>> http://www.centuryoptics.com/products/dv/16x9/16x9_37mm.htm
>>
>> (Google for 'Anamorphic DV lens')
>>
>> --
>> Owamanga!
>>
>
>Do these lenses actually give you a wider field of view?

Not sure about the first one, but the century optics one does increase
the field of view. Both however will limit your zoom ability.

--
Owamanga!
 
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:35:51 GMT, Owamanga <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

>The software solution will loose significant resolution (You'll
>basically be tossing 20% off the top and 20% off the bottom to mask it
>into 16:9), but is the cheapest way forward.

You won't loose that resolution, because you didn't have it in the
first place anyway.

>Or you can pick up a lens that presents a 16:9 image anamorphically to
>a standard DV camera, so it would be possible to master a DVD with no
>loss of resolution, like this one:

Now that is the only way to go with camera's with 4:3 CCD's in them.

cheers

-martin-

--
Can the terror of spam be included in the war on terror?