My first post on the forum, so please let me know if I've done anything wrong.
My friend has offered me a GTX 1660 Super for a very low price to replace my current GTX 1060. The 1060 only requires one 6-pin connector so no worries there. However, 1660's need an 8-pin.
I know people have used 6-pin to 8-pin and gotten away with it, but I was wondering if this config would be safer:
Molex 4-pin>6-pin----- 2x6-pin> 8-pin
6 -pin-------------------┘
IF Molex can provide 54w (?) and 6-pin can provide 75w plus the 75w from the PCIe so 204watts total, (1660s has a 125w TDP) compared to 150w from only using one 6-pin to 8-pin.
Would that extra 54w be worth all the additional cables? Am I better off using just a plain old 6-pin to 8-pin adapter?
My PSU is a dell 525watt from a T3500. My CPU is a Xeon x5675.
Any questions please ask,
chapig_396
My friend has offered me a GTX 1660 Super for a very low price to replace my current GTX 1060. The 1060 only requires one 6-pin connector so no worries there. However, 1660's need an 8-pin.
I know people have used 6-pin to 8-pin and gotten away with it, but I was wondering if this config would be safer:
Molex 4-pin>6-pin----- 2x6-pin> 8-pin
6 -pin-------------------┘
IF Molex can provide 54w (?) and 6-pin can provide 75w plus the 75w from the PCIe so 204watts total, (1660s has a 125w TDP) compared to 150w from only using one 6-pin to 8-pin.
Would that extra 54w be worth all the additional cables? Am I better off using just a plain old 6-pin to 8-pin adapter?
My PSU is a dell 525watt from a T3500. My CPU is a Xeon x5675.
Any questions please ask,
chapig_396