slvr_phoenix
Splendid
Okay, everyone mark their callendars. For once, I am in agreement with Matisaro! Eeek! I hadn't realized that SOI might be as high as three times the cost of silly-cone. Yuck.Heres my take on the non barton soi, believe it or not it is probably cheaper for amd to make barton with 512k cache on bulk silicon, than to make it with 256k on soi silicon, soi silicon is more expensive than bulk(I have heard 3x as expensive, but my fab didnt use soi so IM not sure).
Thus while they both probably give near equal performance, a 512k cache bulk barton costs amd less money to produce.
Thats my take, comments?
If that be true, I have to ask then: What the heck is the point of moving <i>any</i> chip to SOI? Does the end really justify <i>that</i> means?
Heh heh, and I also have to wonder then why Intel isn't the one pushing SOI onto Prescott... He he he.
😛 @ Intel
(Yes folks, I am indeed on cold meds, and the world really is spinning.)
<font color=red>Bob knew he was screwed when he saw the label actually read 'Tactile Nuclear Device'.</font color=red>