mSATA Introduced for Netbook SSDs

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Guest

Guest
Is the flash type a type of SD card -type of flash?
If so the IOPS will be very low!
 

backbydemand

Distinguished
May 26, 2008
81
0
18,630
Kind of makes sense, the only reason SDDs are the size they are is because they need to be the same form factor as existing 2.5" drives. If you take that form factor out of the running and they are the thickness of credit cards then laptop builders can start to scale down thickness of everything else.

One step closer to the 'PAD' style devices you see on Star Trek.
 

alert101

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2006
31
0
18,530
"...that it is currently developing a specification for a mini-SATA (mSATA) interface connector, supporting 1.5 Gb/s and 3.0 Gb/s transfer rates."

Can someone explain to me why 6.0Gb/s is not included? As the article title says "mSATA Introduced for Netbook SSDs". Sure, the drives featuring the new connection will be physically smaller, but as SSD technology advances the transfer rates for the drives will increase past SATA2 rates. Well some current SSDs pretty much saturate SATA2 (3Gbps) already, I can just imagine the speed of future SSDs when this mSATA is finalized. 6-12 months?

Conclusion: We will have super-fast SSDs but the connection will be a bottleneck. How about that?
 

ceteras

Distinguished
Aug 26, 2008
156
0
18,680
[citation][nom]ProDigit80[/nom]Is the flash type a type of SD card -type of flash?If so the IOPS will be very low![/citation]

No way!
Electrically it will still be a SATAinterface, it's just a different format.
See here
 

agentjon

Distinguished
Jul 30, 2009
72
0
18,630
[citation][nom]backbydemand[/nom]Kind of makes sense, the only reason SDDs are the size they are is because they need to be the same form factor as existing 2.5" drives. If you take that form factor out of the running and they are the thickness of credit cards then laptop builders can start to scale down thickness of everything else.One step closer to the 'PAD' style devices you see on Star Trek.[/citation]

Actually the PADDs were ran with Isolinier chips which were both CPU and memory. Add a terequad of memory get a terahert of processing power from teh same part
 
G

Guest

Guest
[citation][nom]ceteras[/nom]No way!Electrically it will still be a SATAinterface, it's just a different format.See here[/citation]
I was referring to the "credit-card sized SSDs", not the interface...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS