I have read some things that OCCT is a better stress tester than Prime. Can i get some of your opinions on this. I have read that 2 hrs. OCCT is more stable than 24 hrs. Prime. Just wondering what you all think. Thanks.
And im not to sure about temps. It shows OCCT takes the cpu up to 100% usage-but im at 1.44 volts 17.5x multiplier-210ht-and after 2 hours of OCCT my temps arent over 46c. i would like it to be right but it just seems a little low.
Both programs do the same function, IMO prime95 streses out the CPU to a higher degree.... and like my friend overshocked said, it has error checking....
OCCT says it has HWmonitor built in so i assume its using that-it shows temps for all three cores. And i have used HWmonitor to monitor temps before i started using OCCT.
Both programs do the same function, IMO prime95 streses out the CPU to a higher degree.... and like my friend overshocked said, it has error checking....
yes i have tried Everest too. Do you guys know what the TMPIN0, TMPIN1, and TMPIN2 temps are ? I have seen that TMPIN0 is motherboard and 1 is cpu and 2 is a no contact-and i have seen 0 as cpu and 1 as NB and 2 as SB. Any clue ?
I like the charts too-TMPIN0-TMPIN1-TMPIN2-what are they ?
IMO TMPIN0-TMPIN1-TMPIN2 are wack temps that are imbeded in CPUID.... One time the TMPIN0 said it was at 107c when it really was at 54c during a torture test (prime95)