Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (
More info?)
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 23:22:04 +0100, Julian Richards <see@sig.co.uk>
wrote:
>On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:51:00 GMT, "AseStar" <a s e s t a r @ s t a r t
>. n o> wrote:
>
>>This has been discussed many many times in past. I suggest you search in
>>google groups for this topic.
>>
>>From personal experience, ATI and Omega are both EXCELLENT drivers. Omega's
>>enable better overclock support for some chips (SE versions) and support
>>Mobility series. Which is why I use them on my m10pro laptop.
>>Omega often have better tweaks for games, so they tend to increase
>>performance or IQ (or both) as opposed to ATI ones..
>>
>>"Striker" <Striker@noclass.rr.com> wrote in message
>>news:Rs1xc.51792$DG4.49904@fe2.columbus.rr.com...
>>> Lets hear some comments about ATI over Omega Drivers or vice versa.
>>> Thanks,
>
>From what I see here, the Omegas seem to have less install/upgrade
>problems.
I would think there's probably a lot more people here using stock Ati
rather than Omega drivers, so we should expect to see more problems.
Pure guess is, per user of either, they probably have equivalent
levels of problems.
patrickp
patrickp@5acoustibop.co.uk - take five to email me