[citation][nom]teh_chem[/nom]I'm not familiar much with Direct Debit Guarantee--just looked it up, and from what I understand, it's supposed to outline how communication and payments are handled between payers and payees. It doesn't seem to do anything that makes how Paypal the company must operate when handling customer accounts (and locking funds, etc.).I would hope that PP in the UK is better than it is in the US, but I don't see how it could be, to be honest.Also, I don't understand how the problem with national and international banks has to do with how Paypal operates. If I go to my bank and stop-payment on a transaction for, say, $100 for something I bought online that either I claim I never received or I claim is not the correct item, it does not result in the entire other person's account being locked (all funds) indefinitely. Generally this only impacts the amount of the transaction in the other person's account, and the other person still retains control of their account funds.If Paypal actually investigated and payed attention to evidence in transaction disputes rather than universally taking side with the customer, then the issues I have might be resolved.But since paypal prefers to appease the buyers that use their service rather than the sellers, it's an inherently unfair business model with absolutely no way for users to audit the process. There are a lot of testimonials of legit sellers who have not conducted their business dishonestly, but after one false claim from a buyer that they did not receive their item, or did not receive the proper item, PP simply freezes and often terminates the seller's account, without actually investigating the issue.A quick example that is a common situation; a seller ships an item, has a receipt for shipping that shows the weight of the item (let's say 5 pounds weight), how much it cost to deliver, and tracking info. The buyer receives the package, but says there was nothing in the delivery (just an empty box). Paypal will not pay attention to the evidence that the seller has that shows that the weight of the delivery was 5 pounds--which proves that the box could not have been empty. Paypal will simply universally side with the customer in this sort of dispute, refund the buyer the transaction amount, debit the seller's account and lock the seller's account due to fraud. Except there was no due diligence to investigate whether this really was fraud because it would cost Paypal too much in time and resources. That's the problem.[/citation]
Well, I have friends, collegues, family members - all have horror stories of their banks hitting them with charges, closing accounts, freezing funds, etcetc and i'm sure if you think about it we all know someone who has had a similar story
...
I'm not saying that Paypal is great, but some people are putting banks on a pedastal and saying banks are way better than Paypal - when they are equally crappy - plus Paypal didn't cause a global financial crash, fiddle Libor rates or engage in shorting on the trading floor