PCI EXPRESS X1

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
YES! It's ugly, useless, and meaningless.

ITS LEGACY (Needs to die)


Edit;


on the need to die list:

10/100 ports
PS2 ports
Serial ports (all)
usb 1.1 only ports
---------------------------


On the replacement list
10/100/1000
More USB 2.0 (1.1 compatible) ports
Firewire 2
eSata
Mini USB ports
Wireless
Status indicator lights (i.e. the 4 on dell)
----------------------------

Create headers for all the legacy ports I dont care.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
But serial and parallel have been along for a long time now and they are pretty much phased out of the mainstream.

My wife just got a Palm VX that's only a few years old at most, it STILL uses a serial port. Of course that pisses me off, since her laptop doesn't have any serial ports.

Personally I would rather have new technology in place of those old ports like eSATA or maybe more room for Dual Ethernet or something along those lines.

More room? There's plenty of room, look at all the boards that come with empty space on the port panel right now.
 
Crashman.... There are $5.99 adapters for serial ports. Though I dont agree that you should be forced to buy them....

Remember how USB keyboards come with an adapter USB to PS2....
Serial technology that INSISTS on sticking around, should come with it boxed.


Please support the death of legacy and cough up $5.99, or start the website: www.smashmylegacyPDA.com and get a new one with a USB cradle.
 

paulmforumz

Distinguished
Dec 15, 2006
18
0
18,510
Asked because read article where PCIe would be replacing PCI (including x1). Guess lot of smoke. (But perhaps x4 x8 way in the future?)
 
oh I am harding b1tching about it.. just making fun of old legacy technology.


Though I would like to see a change towards new tech as old tech is dropped out, while providing adapters, header.... for people who need to use them.. such as: Router/swtich managers.


Long live progress.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
My beef with 1x PCIe connectors is... they are only 1x. WTF? That's less bandwidth than PCI (unless you try to use multiple PCI devices at once).

That's wrong, x1 is 250MB/s, PCI is 133MB/s, and PCI-E has full bandwidth in both directions simultaniously.


Getting unused ports off the mobo would be one step towards bringing the size of teh personal PC down a bit, which hasn't happened in quite awhile. Very frustrating when I'm trying to build a cube PC and half my backplane is taken up by crap I don't even want after already being serverly limited in mobo choice because people appearantly want 8 PCI/PCIe slots for gaming machines... A ducted voltage regulator HSF would be so much cooler (literally).

Nah, the CPU portion of the board remains the same size, so reducing the port panel size does nothing to help. Micro ATX is a good option but still not embraced by gamers. As for cubes, just build them with Cyrix III processors since cubes don't matter. Really, from a performance standpoint their a dead end, and they're fairly horrible for HTPC as well. In the first case, a small tower works better and in the second, a horizontal Micro ATX dektop is superior.
 

RyanMicah

Distinguished
Oct 13, 2006
1,136
3
19,285
Why are you guys arguing about costs? Some stupid tiny cheap adapter isn't $10 anyway. It's more like a buck. But who really cares. THINK. If they're including an adapter on a motherboard, someone is paying for it already. That someone is YOU. Why pay for something you don't need and won't use? Therefore, if you are one of those uber-rare people who still use legacy devices...run out and get a freakin' adapter. As for the MAJORITY of us...we prefer not to buy crap we don't need. Serial ports PS/2 ports, IDE ports...feel free to drop them ALL. They can all be hooked up with a tiny freakin' adapter. And if you whine about the lack of PS/2 support...I'll send you a USB to PS/2 adapter. I have one in my closet.
 

fredgiblet

Distinguished
Jul 8, 2006
573
0
18,980
I like them both. I want them to finally KILL SERIAL ports. NOBODY NEEDS printer / serial ports any more... USB is the way to go.

I work in IT, every switch and router I have seen has a serial port for Command-Line configuration (which you have to do before you can use a web interface (assuming there is a web interface)). The adapter you are talking about? in my experience they don't really like switches and routers. So while I agree with you in principle (I would love to never see a serial parallel or floppy port again, they are still neccesary.
 

BUFF

Distinguished
Dec 17, 2003
1,050
0
19,280
my 2c as a home user/enthusiast:
parallel port can go

PS/2 to stay - 1 because there are times when it's easier too troubleshoot with PS/2 than USB (albeit I'm sure that some BIOS work could reverse this)
I've got a professional grade PS/2 KVM & why should I have to replace a perfectly functional item - have you seen the price of professional grade USB KVMs? They're more than a mobo ...

serial - well I recently had to include serial on a new replacement/upgrade board because I use it to programme a scanner. Yes, I have a serial to USB adapter - does it work, no.

Btw Comptia_Rep, have you looked at something like an abit MAX board?
Apart from the PS/2 ports they've pretty much done away with what you wanted.
 
Ya I have.
Actually, I failed to mention in my biased opinion, that the adapters suck! LOL.
And some programs require ps/2 connected keyboard/mouse (non windows) and the bios doesn't always work faking the system.


Anyway, each manufacturer should offer legacy, or non legacy versions... is that so hard to ask :)
 

kitchenshark

Distinguished
Dec 30, 2005
377
0
18,780
Noooooooo! Leave the PS/2 ports! USB mice and keyboards suck hardcore.

On every motherboard and every usb keyboard and mouse I've ever had to deal with has given me grief. At least 5 different combinations of motherboard and mouse and keyboard manufacturers have failed for no reason. The only way I was able to fix them were with PS/2 keyboards and mice taking the place of the USB, even if only temporarily.

Keep PS/2 until USB connectivity is perfected. And right now...even after all these years of USB...it still isn't perfect enough for me.
 

mguilicutty

Distinguished
Sep 19, 2006
8
0
18,510
One question, with my ps/2 keyboard I can hit the spacebar and turn on my computer. Is this possible with a usb keyboard? Also, this is a pci express thread, why are we talking about the vast superiority of the rs/232 interface over the lowly usb?
 

runswindows95

Distinguished
PS/2 keyboards and mice won't die anytime soon. PS/2 is so much easier to work with than USB. I could never get a USB mouse or keyboard to work when doing a fresh install of XP. Besides, why take away something THAT WORKS! PS/2 is truly plug and play!

Serial and Parallel ports are actually taken off most retail systems these days anyway.

Anyway, back to the MAIN topic of this post, PCI-E 1x will eventually be used more often soon. I keep hearing rumors of sound cards and NIC cards for 1x slots from some IT guys I know.
 

flasher702

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2006
661
0
18,980
My beef with 1x PCIe connectors is... they are only 1x. WTF? That's less bandwidth than PCI (unless you try to use multiple PCI devices at once).

That's wrong, x1 is 250MB/s, PCI is 133MB/s, and PCI-E has full bandwidth in both directions simultaniously.


You are correct. It has 250mbps half-duplex bandwidth which is faster than PCI. That is 250up and down for 500mbps total for PCIe1x (8000mbps full-duplex for a 16x connector which is where you get the "8gbps" you hear most often). For some reason I was thinking it was 250mbps full-duplex and thusly slower than PCIe1x for half-duplex :/
http://www.d-silence.com/feature.php?id=252


Nah, the CPU portion of the board remains the same size, so reducing the port panel size does nothing to help. Micro ATX is a good option but still not embraced by gamers. As for cubes, just build them with Cyrix III processors since cubes don't matter. Really, from a performance standpoint their a dead end, and they're fairly horrible for HTPC as well. In the first case, a small tower works better and in the second, a horizontal Micro ATX dektop is superior.

The IO backplane could be half as tall or half as long easily. Although that wouldn't help to reduce the footprint of the board to less than existing designs it could help free up some valuable space for ventalation. The SFF Dell I'm typing on right now exhausts all of it's heat right past the IO backplane (the entire PC is only ~4" wide). It has no PS/2 connectors on it (unfortunately they still put a parallel and serial port on it though).

Gamers don't embrace micro ATX because micro ATX boards aren't marketed to gamers and ussually lack OC features. If shuttle can make an SLI board that is half the size of a micro ATX board there is no technical reason they couldn't make "enthusiast" micro ATX board.

All of my cubes are gaming machines :p My current main rig is a cube and is SLI capable. It has just as much performance as any other mobo equipped with the same CPU and GFX. Outside of exotic OCing cube PCs are just as powerful as full sized towers. If I wanted to slap raid-0 raptors, SLIed 8800s, and an x6800 into my current case it would work fine (I'd need rear-exhausing GFX cards and to cut a few more intake vents, but rear-exhausting GFX is normal for 8800s and holes in the side panels a very simple mod). My OC would be somewhat limited by mobo and HSF choice, that is all.

Cube PCs are a bit too big and the wrong shape for most HTPC applications. Hardly damning of the case form factor. Size is far from being the biggest problem with the HTPC anyway.

The only thing you really get for a full ATX board is extra expansion slots. But I figure you need 1-2 for GFX , 0-1 for sound, 0-1 for network, 0-1 for raid. So you need 1-5 slots. You can fit 4 in a cube case with ease, most "gaming rigs" use only 1 or 2 slots. The biggest problem is huge GFX card HSFs..., they eat up a lot of space in a cube PC. meaning if you do dual GFX you have, at most, 1 more usuable expansion slot left.

More back on topic: no, your sound card and 10/100 NIC don't each *need* the extra bandwidth of PCIe (at least not at this time, your raid controller and 1000mbit NIC do though) and getting PCIe ones instead of PCI ones won't make your network noticibly faster or sound better. But PCIe has many other features that make it better such as dedicated bandwidth, reduced latencies, and smaller connectors (for 1x) making it cheaper and easier to deploy and if you try to use more than 1 device on the PCI bus at once (this includes many integrated ports) at once there will be a noticable performance degridation. I think it also generates less EMI has higher EMI resistance, can provide more power, has better power saving options, and uses significantly less power/performance.

This isn't like Dual GFX or Dual Core, this is a real technological advancement that improves performance, effeciency, and lowers cost. Your sound card didn't get any better when it went to PCI from ISA either, but imagine the impact it would have on your system to include an ISA bridge and a huge ISA connector on your new mobo... GFX cards didn't get any faster when they first went to PCIe16x from AGP either (they maybe pushed that one through a little sooner than they needed to, but we needed to switch over sometime to get the new interface available and cheap). The sooner we get switched over the sooner we can all reap the full benefits. PCIe is good, don't fight it ;)

We are kind of waiting on increased availability of PCIe devices though :/ I need a new WiFi card sometime in the near future but I really hate to buy a PCI one...
 

flasher702

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2006
661
0
18,980
PS/2 keyboards and mice won't die anytime soon. PS/2 is so much easier to work with than USB. I could never get a USB mouse or keyboard to work when doing a fresh install of XP. Besides, why take away something THAT WORKS! PS/2 is truly plug and play!

They aren't meant to be hot-swappable though. Some mobo manufacturers and IO chipsets/drivers make accomidation for hot-swapping PS/2 devices (I've had some systems it worked on, some didn't). In theory you could fry your mobo by hot swapping PS/2 devices. USB has stagged pins, and shielding designed to disperse charges and equalize grounds as it is being plugged in. I believe some sort of surge compensation is also part of the spec. It is designed to be hot swapped and as we all know it works pretty well.

I haven't had any problems with USB keyboard/mouse in a year or two, but I have experienced problems with BIOS, DOS, and fresh installs as you mentioned. These problems have been ironed out and if you use a newer mobo and keyboard you shouldn't have any problems.
 

martyjs

Distinguished
Jun 25, 2006
367
0
18,780
I disagree, I am an enthusiast and a Computer tech were I work, Every system I have built for my self over the last 14 years is built to be as flexible as possible. The new system I,m build will include a Motherboard with PCIe Slots, PCI slots, when picking it I made sure it had 1 serial port, 1 parallel port and I even fitted a floppy. Never know when relitaves or friend drop in with old computers or printers they want me to test.
If I had kept every old computer I,ve owned for testing, there wouldn't be any room for the family. :? :? :? :? :?