Pentium g3258 vs i3-4150 for gaming

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

HahnSolo

Reputable
Jul 11, 2014
86
0
4,640
The Pentium has massive overclock-ability (up to 4.5 Ghz on stock cooler), but has only 2 threads and 2 cores. The i3 has 4 threads and 2 cores and hyper threading, which makes it close to a quad core level of performance, but it cant overclock. Im kind of torn between the two. The i3 is about $30 more expensive too. Which is better?
 
Solution
All the synthetics everyone here is talking about (like PassMark for example) are the pinnacle of stupidity in this thread. As Rit_86 posted - take a look at Anandtech's review. At 4.7 GHz - the 3258 cant overtake a I3 4330.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/8232/overclockable-pentium-anniversary-edition-review-the-intel-pentium-g3258-ae/4

And to get a 3258 at 4.7 GHz you need to spend money on a cooler and get extremely lucky. Why do you need to spend the same money that an i3 is, to buy a Pentium and a cooler and hope you win the silicon lottery. Not all 3258s can get to 4.5. It is not a safe bet. Just get an i3 and don't look back. It is painless, no OC involved, no cooler upgrade needed, no good OC motherboard required - it just...


My g3258 is running 4.7 stable through summer with full custom loop. You talk like getting a better mobo and cooler should be ignored by instead getting a better cpu, where I'd rather spend decent money on cooling and mobo, OC the cheap chip and just buy an I7 K later and fit it to my OC mobo with my custom loop.

 


@ 1080p and with a single GPU the I7 is a overkill for the price, a I5K is the way to go unless your running 4K and multiple GPU's. A G3258 is a good placeholder but it's not something you want to keep much longer as games are demanding Multicore performance. G3258 Vs I3.. long argument we have seen it before, I don't keep either one to long as they both tend to have issues with Multiplayer Gaming.