Phenom II X6: First Details Of ‘Thuban’ Design Emerge

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

hamiac

Distinguished
Feb 22, 2010
117
0
18,690
[citation][nom]gkay09[/nom]If the X6 can beat the i7 920/ 930 and remain in the same price range, then AMD will have a winner in the enthusiast segment IMO...[/citation]
Well as much as I like AMD, knowing them, it will all be too late and intel will have something outrageously more awesome and a price to match
 

hamiac

Distinguished
Feb 22, 2010
117
0
18,690
[citation][nom]noob2222[/nom]Thats called bulldozer, possible samples q4, production q1-q2 2011. That is unless GF transition to 32 and 22nm goes really well, or really bad.[/citation]
Sorry, meant to quote this post :(
 

RazberyBandit

Distinguished
Dec 25, 2008
2,303
0
19,960

Thanks man. I really appreciate it when you take the time to actually reply to questions and concerns like this. One of the reasons I rarely miss anything you publish here at Tom's.

And no, I'm not brown-nosing here - just speakin' the truth.
 
Another month, another exciting product launch. This keeps getting better!

Of course, by the tone of this article, it seems that Tom's has already gotten a few of these engineering samples, I presume?

/Offtopic/
I would've called the Turbo feature "Supercharge" just to differentiate from Intel's implementatation xD
 
I can't wait for the energy efficient models to come out even if they are low clocked. I prefer AMD's chip binning compared to Intel which grants a few samples that use less power per clock than normal binned samples. 65w is typically my preferred area how ever getting any thing with more than two cores at that wattage isn't that easy to track down at a fair price some times but that is what it is. Just got my self a 8250e for every day use $30 below what newegg is charging.
 
On the CPU front, I'm not sure if this will give AMD a big performance boost. It will be interesting to see how it helps their efficiency, which has also lagged Intel somewhat. I just hope I can justify getting one of these :ange: :whistle: . On the GPU front however, nVidia must not have this process technology, which may explain why Fermi is so hot and hungry.
 

gazukull

Distinguished
Feb 3, 2007
11
0
18,510
Here is the real question: Will a AMD 6-core beat an OC'd i7 930? Cinebench specifically. I bet on no... so I just picked up my i7 930 from Microcenter yesterday... I probably should have waited until the benches.
 

zoemayne

Distinguished
Aug 2, 2009
422
0
18,780
Eventually AMD will pass Intel. I'm sure with the billion they received from the lawsuit won they will succeed. I'm pretty sure ($1000 million reasons) that AMD processors are slower b/c of intels "practices". Since they cant use those "practices" any more AMD will get better. But I doubt that AMD was able to apply that 1 billion to improve this processor line up(especially since its not a lump sum payment) in such a short amount of time.
 

joe gamer

Distinguished
Mar 11, 2010
109
0
18,680
Hrm... I've been holding out for a 32nm quad-core from Intel but perhaps I could go with a 45nm sext(?)-core from AMD. I wonder if the 5870 would perform better with AMD's platform or if it would matter at all? We need more benchmarks lol.
 

deltatux

Distinguished
Jul 29, 2008
335
0
18,780
[citation][nom]daniel266[/nom]if just AMD put The "Hyper threading" feature on this cpus im sure it will beat some of the i7 with a price we can afford ..forget 980 ..$1099 price....[/citation]

Hyperthreading's just Intel's implementation of simultaneous multithreading (SMT). Issue with SMT on x86 architecture is that it trades more throughput for more latencies. In some cases it will degrade performance, there's no free lunch as you're also going to cause other side effects on the CPU due to SMT.

For me, generally I'd either suggest people to turn it off or don't even have it on the CPU at all as it doesn't provide much of a speed gain and in some cases, it will slow things down. That's why I'm still questioning why Intel bothered with Hyperthreading in Nehalem.
 

werfu

Distinguished
Sep 27, 2008
54
0
18,630
I can't wait for AMD to switch to 32nm! These will be killer CPUs. If they can hit 3.2Ghz on a 6-core at 45nm, they will easily hit 4Ghz on 32nm! I really hope that AMD also find a way to increase performance per clock on their newer design.
 
I think Thubans price tells a story. If the pricing is true, it is priced right near a Core i7 920 which means thats probably where its performance will be. If it did beat Gulftown easily I would expect it to be priced much like Gulftown, just like Athlon FX was priced like Pentium 4/D.
 


If this chip is more energy-efficient, those running server farms or clusters may still find it worthwhile, even if apps can't yet use those extra cores and performance is no better than an existing triple- or quad-core. The price doesn't look like it will be outrageous, especially compared to Intel's offerings.
 

soliloquist

Distinguished
Dec 26, 2006
17
0
18,510
So for these new hex cores will there be 3 "power states"?
1 Normal (all cores at 3.2Ghz)
2 Turbo (3 cores +500Mhz and 3 cores at 800Mhz)
3 CoolnQuiet (all cores 800Mhz)
Or will you have to turn on either CnQ or Turbo?
 

hundredislandsboy

Distinguished
Cool with me. After a few months when the have more than they can sell and news comes out that C4 stepping quadcores come out withunlockable two extra cores for 6 cores total - I'm buying and unleashing!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.