I already have a Sony Bravia 42" LED TV being used as my PC monitor (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sony-KDL42W705B-42-inch-Widescreen-Freeview/dp/B00HZAVA70) which is great, it has a low response time (for a TV), has an awesome picture in general, and generally works well as a PC monitor. So my question is, considering my PC is only really capable of maxing games graphics settings out at 1080p 60fps (i7-4790k & EVGA 980ti FTW) would I benefit from the Philips display linked below? And when I say benefit I mean will I notice any improvement to the picture at all (at 1080p)?
The reason I've started looking at a proper monitor is because a game I've started playing (Squad) has a test firing range and I happened to mention on a forum that I struggled to hit a target at 700m with iron sights and could barely even see the targets beyond that at all so couldn't hit them, but someone else said they could see the targets beyond no problem and could just about hit a target at 1000m with a bit of luck. They mentioned that the reason I was struggling was probably down to the fact that I was using a TV not a monitor. I'm sure he also mentioned though that he too was at 1080 also
Is that likely to be the case, ie: with both at 1080p will I see more with the Philips? Or is it more likely that it's a resolution issue, ie: ill see more at a higher resolution regardless of which TV or Monitor I use? My gut feeling here is that it's the resolution that will play a bigger part in what I see rather than whether I'm using a TV/monitor as the way I see it, 1080p is 1080p, you can't see what isn't there.
The reason I bought a 1080p TV is because I like a really large monitor and my PC isn't currently capable of playing 4K games at 60fps, especially as some of my games do not support SLI (the main reason I only have 1 980ti and not 2).
Philips
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/philips-bdm4065uc-40-inch-ultra-hd-monitor,review-33334.html
The reason I've started looking at a proper monitor is because a game I've started playing (Squad) has a test firing range and I happened to mention on a forum that I struggled to hit a target at 700m with iron sights and could barely even see the targets beyond that at all so couldn't hit them, but someone else said they could see the targets beyond no problem and could just about hit a target at 1000m with a bit of luck. They mentioned that the reason I was struggling was probably down to the fact that I was using a TV not a monitor. I'm sure he also mentioned though that he too was at 1080 also
Is that likely to be the case, ie: with both at 1080p will I see more with the Philips? Or is it more likely that it's a resolution issue, ie: ill see more at a higher resolution regardless of which TV or Monitor I use? My gut feeling here is that it's the resolution that will play a bigger part in what I see rather than whether I'm using a TV/monitor as the way I see it, 1080p is 1080p, you can't see what isn't there.
The reason I bought a 1080p TV is because I like a really large monitor and my PC isn't currently capable of playing 4K games at 60fps, especially as some of my games do not support SLI (the main reason I only have 1 980ti and not 2).
Philips
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/philips-bdm4065uc-40-inch-ultra-hd-monitor,review-33334.html