Archived from groups: alt.sys.pc-clone.gateway2000 (
More info?)
Netscape 7.1 is loaded up with all the AOL-oriented trashware. As alternatives,
consider Mozilla 1.6, and Firebird (release number not on the tip of my tongue).
Both of them stop pop-ups dead in their tracks. Firebird is supposed to be the
lean-and-mean one. My son uses it, and likes it a lot. I use Mozilla 1.6.
Both are open-source browsers, free of charge, and undergoing continued
enhancement, unlike the relatively moribund IE.
Visit www.mozilla.org .
I have also serviced client machines in which IE has gotten completely hosed up
and become totally non-functional. I've installed Mozilla, which works, of
course. Once in a while I've even succeeded in downloading IE6 using Mozilla,
then actually getting a working IE again. The only alternative is the painful
one of reformatting the hard drive and installing everything from scratch again.
But without backup and all original software program media, this is often
unacceptable to my clients. Last week, I installed Mozilla on a client's
computer, and get IE6 back to the point where it would only lock up the computer
half of the time when browsing, and would lock up the computer on the Yahoo home
page. So I explained in 30 sec how to use Mozilla, and that is that.
All of the above strongly argues against the Microsoft party line and practice
of continuning to integrate tightly its poorly designed toys into its equally
poorly designed operating system. Neither the US DOJ in its aborted anti-trust
suit nor Mario Monti's EU trust busters gave sufficient consideration to the
effect on consumers of essentially unrepairable software. Nope, there is no
magic repair button for this, either... Ben Myers
On Sun, 02 May 2004 17:17:30 -0700, An & Larry <tpsdoc@pol.net> wrote:
>We have a G6-300 and dell laptop both running win98se and same CPU
>(slow). 96 MB RAM. Netscape 7.1 and IE 5.5 seem to take too much
>resources and frequently crash. I've read in this newsgroup (I think)
>that there are other browsers that are less resource intensive? Any
>suggestions appreciated.
>--
>A & L
>
>Support your local PJ
>