POP3 and SMTP servers?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

"Bruce Chastain" <bchastain@XNOSPAMXhyperfeed.com> wrote in message
news:bfcMc.10704$f4.6560@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
| "Jason Cothran" <reply@board.nomail> wrote in message
| news:Mh7Mc.16816$GT3.5874@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
| > You can send "email" through Cingular over SMS in the same manner using
| > Cingular's SMS gateway. In all your hard research before flaming, I
guess
| > you missed that.
|
| Not at all. Az I've noted in this and other threads (do the research),
the
| Ciingular email over SMS doesn't work properly.
|
| All the incoming message show as being from "36-245" in the inbox, and
| replies to those messages go in to a black hole somewhere, and are never
| delivered to the message originator.
|
| The Cingular email over SMS is unusable for those reasons, and calls to
| Cingular haven't helped.
|
| If you have any hints on how to make that work, I'd sure appreciate your
| constructive reply.
|


If you can't get that to work, you can always go MMS route, which is better
(albeit more expensive) than SMS due to what it can contain anyway. Addess
to (10digit#)@mms.mycingular.com
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:_TeMc.3884$54.55658@typhoon.sonic.net...
> As he wrote, the Cingular SMS-email *Gateway* works properly.

Sorry, but it's not working on my phone. As I said, it's unusable as
implimented and documented.

Thanks for the info John, but nothing you've offered has improved the
situation here at all.

> You need to address your messages properly. That's a snap on my SE
Z600 --
> I just highlight the sending email address, press Send, compose the email
> message, and then send it to the SMS-email Gateway (121).

I have no idea what that means. I've tried chanfing the to: on replies to
121 and the message just goes in to the same black hole as always.

On my v400, all the incoming messages show as "36-245" (regardless of sender
address) so there's no email address to hightlght.

> Works fine.

I wish.

> Just as I'd sure appreciate your more constructive attitude. ;-)

Like I said, it still doesn't work.

Bruce.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

"Røbert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote in message
news:rmarkoff-37E6A5.16355123072004@news6.west.earthlink.net...
> <http://alliance.cingularinteractive.com/products/pdf/DeviceSoftwareSetti
> ngs.pdf>
>
> Is more of a reference manual than a how to.

It made for interesting reading, those parts that I understood, but didn't
offer anything that helped in my case.

Bruce.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

Robert M. wrote:
> In article <%lfMc.3892$54.55739@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>
>>In <rmarkoff-873157.16203323072004@news6.west.earthlink.net> on Fri, 23 Jul
>>2004 21:20:33 GMT, "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article <_TeMc.3884$54.55658@typhoon.sonic.net>,
>>>John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>Just as I'd sure appreciate your more constructive attitude. ;-)
>>>
>>>Care to point us to a Cingular URL with instructions?
>>
>>I've already done that, as you should know if you've been paying attention.
>
>
> So arrogant.

My guess is he's just familiar with your reputation around here.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

"Cambie" <user@example.net> wrote in message
news:q-KdnayiTN-FIJ_cRVn-jg@giganews.com...
| Robert M. wrote:
| > In article <%lfMc.3892$54.55739@typhoon.sonic.net>,
| > John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
| >
| >
| >>In <rmarkoff-873157.16203323072004@news6.west.earthlink.net> on Fri, 23
Jul
| >>2004 21:20:33 GMT, "Robert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote:
| >>
| >>
| >>>In article <_TeMc.3884$54.55658@typhoon.sonic.net>,
| >>>John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
| >>
| >>>>Just as I'd sure appreciate your more constructive attitude. ;-)
| >>>
| >>>Care to point us to a Cingular URL with instructions?
| >>
| >>I've already done that, as you should know if you've been paying
attention.
| >
| >
| > So arrogant.
|
| My guess is he's just familiar with your reputation around here.

I figured everyone had him on kill file by now.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <BWgMc.2795$NO3.2564@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com> on Fri, 23 Jul 2004
23:11:29 GMT, "Bruce Chastain" <bachastain@XNOSPAMXsbcglobal.net> wrote:

>"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>news:_TeMc.3884$54.55658@typhoon.sonic.net...
>> As he wrote, the Cingular SMS-email *Gateway* works properly.
>
>Sorry, but it's not working on my phone. As I said, it's unusable as
>implimented and documented.
>
>Thanks for the info John, but nothing you've offered has improved the
>situation here at all.

The Cingular email-SMS gateway can be used with *any* phone that can send and
receive SMS messages.

>> You need to address your messages properly. That's a snap on my SE Z600 --
>> I just highlight the sending email address, press Send, compose the email
>> message, and then send it to the SMS-email Gateway (121).
>
>I have no idea what that means. I've tried chanfing the to: on replies to
>121 and the message just goes in to the same black hole as always.

It will work if the message is formatted properly.

>On my v400, all the incoming messages show as "36-245" (regardless of sender
>address) so there's no email address to hightlght.

The email address is in the body of the SMS message.

>> Works fine.
>
>I wish.
>
>> Just as I'd sure appreciate your more constructive attitude. ;-)
>
>Like I said, it still doesn't work.

Why am I not surprised.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:RDTMc.4116$54.60948@typhoon.sonic.net...
> Why am I not surprised.

That's enough. Welcome to my killfile.

Bruce.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <OCXMc.42751$eH1.20037650@newssvr28.news.prodigy.com> on Sun, 25 Jul 2004
23:45:50 GMT, "Bruce Chastain" <bachastain@XNOSPAMXsbcglobal.net> wrote:

>"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
>news:RDTMc.4116$54.60948@typhoon.sonic.net...

>> Why am I not surprised.
>
>That's enough. Welcome to my killfile.

How childish. Again, why am I not surprised.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:2%YMc.4131$54.61495@typhoon.sonic.net...
| [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
|
| In <OCXMc.42751$eH1.20037650@newssvr28.news.prodigy.com> on Sun, 25 Jul
2004
| 23:45:50 GMT, "Bruce Chastain" <bachastain@XNOSPAMXsbcglobal.net> wrote:
|
| >"John Navas" <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
| >news:RDTMc.4116$54.60948@typhoon.sonic.net...
|
| >> Why am I not surprised.
| >
| >That's enough. Welcome to my killfile.
|
| How childish. Again, why am I not surprised.
|

For whatever reason, Bruce already decided it wouldn't work. That's why I
quit replying. It is very simple to do, but he was here to rant about his
shortcomings instead of look for help. He then got mad when he found out he
was dead wrong.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

"Jason Cothran" <reply@board.nomail> wrote in message
news:Nb7Nc.21975$GT3.21764@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> For whatever reason, Bruce already decided it wouldn't work. That's why I
> quit replying. It is very simple to do, but he was here to rant about his
> shortcomings instead of look for help. He then got mad when he found out
he
> was dead wrong.

Jason, my apologies if you posted something here that would make my v400
work. I remember no such posting, and I believe I've tried everything
everyone suggested without success. Email messages to me still come in with
a reply address of 36-245 (regardless of source) and replies to those
messages go nowhere. Nothing has changed.

As for John, he has a long history of combative and personal attacks (he was
the only one I ever filtered in a photography newsgroup). I had hopes he
would be able to stick to the issues here, but it quickly became apparent
that he is here for the combat, not to help people..

Bruce.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <Yo8Nc.14093$iK.9773@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net> on Mon, 26 Jul 2004
14:18:32 GMT, "Bruce Chastain" <bchastain@XNOSPAMXhyperfeed.com> wrote:

>"Jason Cothran" <reply@board.nomail> wrote in message
>news:Nb7Nc.21975$GT3.21764@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>> For whatever reason, Bruce already decided it wouldn't work. That's why I
>> quit replying. It is very simple to do, but he was here to rant about his
>> shortcomings instead of look for help. He then got mad when he found out he
>> was dead wrong.
>
>Jason, my apologies if you posted something here that would make my v400
>work.

And for your attitude?

>I remember no such posting,

There were a number of such postings by a number of people here.

>and I believe I've tried everything
>everyone suggested without success.

It's pretty clear that you don't really want to be helped -- you mostly want
to vent and argue. The information provided is fairly simple to use and
*does* work.

>Email messages to me still come in with
>a reply address of 36-245 (regardless of source) and replies to those
>messages go nowhere. Nothing has changed.

Indeed, including your attitude. As has been explained to you:
1. That's the address of the incoming Gateway.
2. The sender's email address is in the body of the message.
3. You have to send your reply to the outgoing Gateway.
4. The reply email address must be in the body of your message.
How (3) and (4) are accomplished depends on the particular phone, but can
always be done manually. If you'd had less attitude and a more open mind,
you'd know that.

>As for John, he has a long history of combative and personal attacks (he was
>the only one I ever filtered in a photography newsgroup). I had hopes he
>would be able to stick to the issues here, but it quickly became apparent
>that he is here for the combat, not to help people..

Ad hominem. Why am I not surprised. At least you're consistent.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <Yo8Nc.14093$iK.9773@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
"Bruce Chastain" <bchastain@XNOSPAMXhyperfeed.com> wrote:

> As for John, he has a long history of combative and personal attacks (he was
> the only one I ever filtered in a photography newsgroup). I had hopes he
> would be able to stick to the issues here, but it quickly became apparent
> that he is here for the combat, not to help people..

I disagree, he seems as much interested in trying to pat himself on the
back.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

Røbert M., while diddling his dog..answered:

> In article <Yo8Nc.14093$iK.9773@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "Bruce Chastain" <bchastain@XNOSPAMXhyperfeed.com> wrote:
>
>
>>As for John, he has a long history of combative and personal attacks (he was
>>the only one I ever filtered in a photography newsgroup). I had hopes he
>>would be able to stick to the issues here, but it quickly became apparent
>>that he is here for the combat, not to help people..
>
>
> I disagree, he seems as much interested in trying to pat himself on the
> back.


at least he doesn't get his jollies fellating his dog like you do.


Frau Himmel
Still trying to outrun the death grip clutches of The Strangler
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <rmarkoff-2B77FE.10562526072004@news1.west.earthlink.net> on Mon, 26 Jul
2004 15:56:25 GMT, "Røbert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote:

>In article <Yo8Nc.14093$iK.9773@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
> "Bruce Chastain" <bchastain@XNOSPAMXhyperfeed.com> wrote:
>
>> As for John, he has a long history of combative and personal attacks (he was
>> the only one I ever filtered in a photography newsgroup). I had hopes he
>> would be able to stick to the issues here, but it quickly became apparent
>> that he is here for the combat, not to help people..
>
>I disagree, he seems as much interested in trying to pat himself on the
>back.

Pot ... kettle ... ;-)

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <2mlchrFnnokvU2@uni-berlin.de>,
Frau Himmel <Frau_Himmel@hotmail.com> while goose-stepping wrote:

> obscene childish insults...


But tis to be expected from the children of Germany.


PLONK
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <rmarkoff-0F11E5.17230326072004@news4.west.earthlink.net> on Mon, 26 Jul
2004 22:23:03 GMT, "Røbert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote:

>In article <2mlchrFnnokvU2@uni-berlin.de>,
> Frau Himmel <Frau_Himmel@hotmail.com> while goose-stepping wrote:
>
>> obscene childish insults...
>
>
>But tis to be expected from the children of Germany.
>
>
>PLONK

OK, Røbert and Frau Himmel, enough already. This exchange clearly violates
the charter of this newsgroup (which I wrote). If it continues, complaints
will be filed with your news providers. Either grow up, or go someplace else.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <YHiNc.4300$54.64428@typhoon.sonic.net>,
John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> OK, Røbert and Frau Himmel, enough already. This exchange clearly violates
> the charter of this newsgroup (which I wrote). If it continues, complaints
> will be filed with your news providers. Either grow up, or go someplace else.

Poor Navas, thinks he runs USENET.

This group is unmoderated.

Go complain to a German ISP and see what it gets you.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <rmarkoff-15309D.21111426072004@news4.west.earthlink.net> on Tue, 27 Jul
2004 02:11:14 GMT, "Røbert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote:

>In article <YHiNc.4300$54.64428@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, Røbert and Frau Himmel, enough already. This exchange clearly violates
>> the charter of this newsgroup (which I wrote). If it continues, complaints
>> will be filed with your news providers. Either grow up, or go someplace else.
>
>Poor Navas, thinks he runs USENET.
>
>This group is unmoderated.
>
>Go complain to a German ISP and see what it gets you.

Irrelevant -- we can filter your posts to major news servers.
So keep right on being a jerk, and see where it gets you. ;-)

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.cingular (More info?)

In article <LOkNc.4308$54.64657@typhoon.sonic.net>,
John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <rmarkoff-15309D.21111426072004@news4.west.earthlink.net> on Tue, 27 Jul
> 2004 02:11:14 GMT, "Røbert M." <rmarkoff@faq.cIty> wrote:
>
> >In article <YHiNc.4300$54.64428@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> > John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> >
> >> OK, Røbert and Frau Himmel, enough already. This exchange clearly
> >> violates
> >> the charter of this newsgroup (which I wrote). If it continues,
> >> complaints
> >> will be filed with your news providers. Either grow up, or go someplace
> >> else.
> >
> >Poor Navas, thinks he runs USENET.
> >
> >This group is unmoderated.
> >
> >Go complain to a German ISP and see what it gets you.
>
> Irrelevant -- we can filter your posts to major news servers.
> So keep right on being a jerk, and see where it gets you. ;-)

You sure have delusions of grandeur. I am not the one using bad language
and calling people names.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom