Archived from groups: rec.games.roguelike.angband (
More info?)
Alexander Ulyanov <posband@earthsea.org.invalid>:
> On 2005-04-01, Ralf Arens wrote:
[...]
>> I didn't make it to stat gain. Died yesterday at 950ft when I was
>> knocked out by Ice Ogres (never encountered them before).
> They were introduced in NPP long ago (v0.1.x I think).
Serves me right for almost playing only ToME in the last three years.
;-)
> At this depth ogres are approximately as dangerous as trolls,
Seemingly, yes. When I realised it, it was too late. I used all my
Scrolls of Phase Door but was a bit unlucky where I was teleported.
> although potion-shattering cold attack is a big nuisance.
Oh yes! At the moment I'm playing an HE rogue (clvl 35, 2000ft) in
NPP, half of my PoCCW are shattered not drunken. :-(
BTW, was this changed in Vanilla/NPP/Pos? I don't have memories that cold
attacks were such a nuisance years ago.
>> But as I understood it the problem, it is not about reaching statgain
>> but about reaching clvl 15, when DEs can specialize (Warrior, Mage, or
>> Priest).
> Yes. After all, I didn't plan to mark them "Hard".
> OTOH I don't want to change them much either... I thought about
> giving them a stack of poisoned darts on the birth. What do you
> think?
Darts? Or do you mean arrows? Yes, I think that could work but I can't
really estimate how fast they'll disappear when used. I would
test it, if you send a patch.
>>> Both credit an ego bow -- and both credit an ego
>>> longbow of the *same type* in fact. Coincidence?
>> Are the quest rewards biased towards race/class? (Too lazy to look
>> into the source code.)
> No, they aren't. Until recently they were biased by several bugs,
> though.
🙂
>>> Or can it only be done with a Long Bow of Power?
>> Please compare the bows we're speaking of, mine was (+7,+9), which
>> isn't much for a Bow of Power -- I was really disappointed when I got
>> it. The other one in question was (+6,+22) which is IMHO a huge
>> difference.
> (+7,+9) long bow is still a great weapon for low levels -- usually
> enough to guarantee survival.
Agreed. But probably (+4,+4) would have been sufficient.
Ralf