But the marketing image shows the correct processor. The lid mess up processor, removing it makes it impossible to install the chip in the socket.My concern being that the marketing images are being confused with installation/use instructions.
That picture is just what's called "Artist's render" not an actual photo. You are taking it too literaryBut the marketing image shows the correct processor. The lid mess up processor, removing it makes it impossible to install the chip in the socket.
The frame around the chip is needed to install the processor in the socket.That picture is just what's called "Artist's render" not an actual photo. You are taking it too literary
are you still thinking of your direct fan is better than having a heatsink?
The CPU temperature under load reaches 70 degrees. It can be cooled until the cores in home computers freeze.What is the point of this concern?
Back up. What are you talking about. Is this your previous cooler design? If so, what is your point?The CPU temperature under load reaches 70 degrees. It can be cooled until the cores in home computers freeze.
That's an Intel CPU. Desktop Ryzen are held on all sides and corners. Ryzen H suffix CPUs are meant for portable devices, soldered to MB and likely direct die cooling without IHS. Still don't see what it has to do with with artist's rendered picture of possible innards. That's like comparing comics to photos.The frame around the chip is needed to install the processor in the socket.
![]()
The CPU temperature under load reaches 70 degrees. It can be cooled until the cores in home computers freeze.
But need to reach the minimum temperature to increase the core frequency.70 is not that high these days. Modern chips are like 95c+ for max temps.
But need to reach the minimum temperature to increase the core frequency.
there is no min temp for increase frequency that I know of. there are max temp that will decrease the core frequencyBut need to reach the minimum temperature to increase the core frequency.