Mr Kagouris :
While I'm not here to bash anyone, I'd say the tier-based list model has a few flaws. Instead, wouldn't it work better if we rated PSUs based on where they belong? For example why not have "categories" such as "low end gaming rig acceptable", "high end gaming rig acceptable", "office computer acceptable" and so on and so forth (with a "trash" category of course)? …
Onus :
^That's not a bad idea at all. The only point it might miss is durability, but even that can be addressed in a notation.
You can still arrange them in "tiers" so to speak, to account for a suggestion like "If the power in your area is bad, move up a tier (or two), or make sure you use a good surge protector or UPS."
Karadjgne :
That would work, except it's not what posters I've seen here are asking for. Where would you put a 550w psu? High end is where? My rig is all good quality, but not all that powerful, a 550w G2, 3770k,msi mpower, STRIX 970. Does cost donate high end? Or performance. …
All I'm saying, as I've said before, this list is a tool. It complicated enough for advanced users and simple enough for beginners to understand.
…
Darkbreeze :
Additionally, that's already been suggested in one form or another and is kind of irrelevant anyhow as there are really no units that are only for one thing or another once you get to a certain point. …
I like the idea of reducing the number of tiers, or re-categorizing them. For example, maybe something like "gaming/enthusiast/overclocking", "home/office", "屁话". Maybe also have an in-between category for "keep if your pre-built PC came with it, but upgrade if you upgrade anything else, and for sure before the PC's warranty expires." (Anything in the trash category would mean "don't even plug in your pre-built PC until you've ripped this out and installed a better PSU!")
Also I'd like to see longevity (in usage at least) taken into account. For example, if you live in Barrow, AK, only use your computer a few hours a day a couple days a week with light loads and are replacing it after a few years, you can get away with a lower-end PSU. But, if you live in a metal non-insulated shed in Yuma, AZ, with no A/C, play Crysis 3 at 4K 144fps max settings 14 hours a day 6 days a week, are folding when you're not gaming, and are keeping your i7-6950X-based system until an Atom's single threaded cinebench score creams your i7's multi-threaded score, then get a tier or two better PSU than otherwise recommended.
Also I was briefly thinking a little bit ago, something like ... "if it can't run the advertised wattage, all on the 12V rail(s), 24/7, in a 50°C environment, for the entire warranty period, and if it exceeds more than 10% of ATX specifications for things like voltage regulation and ripple, then it's Tier 5" (based on the current list methodology) … but would that be a bit harsh?
Mr Kagouris :
CTurbo :
You will see that happening in Newegg reviews, which is one of the reasons why I'm against store reviews. Poor models get rated too low, and good models don't get the praise they deserve because of bad refunds. :lol:
OMG I hate user reviews from online retailers. The average consumer is so stupid and ignorant they shouldn't be allowed to give a rating. People give great products 1 star because shipping was slow or they didn't receive their rebate, and they give crap products 5 starts because "I plugged it in and it worked". …
So yeah, people are stupid, and you can't trust most user reviews.
I've seen worse. Person bought a 980 Ti, complained GTA V didn't run at the FPS he saw in 980 Ti benchmarks.
He had a 30$ Pentium and 6GB of RAM.
I actually do check out the Newegg reviews when shopping. Generally on most things, I'm much less likely to consider an item if it has 3 or fewer eggs overall, has less than 70% 5-egg reviews, more than 20% 1-egg reviews, etc. I do bend that somewhat for items with few reviews, and I usually do read the actual reviews, especially the 1 and 2-egg ones, before deciding on a particular product. (There's been several occasions where I saw a product with one bad review dragging its overall score down, but reading the reviews, the person that gave it the 1-egg re-reviewed it with 5 eggs, saying he'd made some mistake when he gave it the 1-egg score. On at least a couple things - I think RAM sticks or something, it would be all 5-egg reviews if it wasn't for that 1-egg anomaly.)
I agree, though, reviews for service should be kept separate from reviews for the product.
Edit: Hmm... I guess this isn't quite like another forum I'm sometimes on.
🙁 There, when you quote someone, it makes a link to their post, but this doesn't seem to work that way. :/