QOTD: How Fast is Your Net Connection?

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertised: 8M/sec down, 1M/sec up.
Actual: ~7M/sec down, a little less than 1M/sec up

Cable internet from WOW in Detroit, $70 a month bundled with regular digital cable TV. I was decently happy with this until I saw how much faster Japan's access is. Lucky them!
 
54.99 for 8mbps. not too much bottleneck but not completely consistent at all times. I do know firsthand many asian countries get fiber right to their house/apartment.
 
[citation][nom]budtske[/nom]12Mbit/320Kbit subscription, syncs at 9Mbit/320Kbit because of distance to DSLAM.(Belgium, Flemish part)Any users commenting that are on an ADSL/ADSL2(+) or VDSL network should state the speed they sync at, this degrades when increasing the distance to the DSLAM (meaning, total lenght over RJ11 copper telephone wire)[/citation]

budtske, thats basically true for any connection, the further you're out from the node in cable the more errors and the harder time you will have with uploads in a coaxial (cable) connection

for xDSL technologies, its just reported train rates that you see as your copper telephone lines arent RJ11 (thats the jack connection type) most feeder/distribution cables for the Telco's is CAT1+ so you receive alot of interference which create errors as the lack of "twist" in the cable creates interference issues from "crosstalk" or typically interference from other digital and analog data circuits in the same cable (think T1's and ISDN)

Loop length is a misconception that is commonly used as its just easier to the 'laymens' not in the telco industry

the actual issues are bridge taps, loop resistance, and interference. Typically, I have found in my years in the telco industry, its the home wiring that creates the biggest issues as the further out from the DSLAM or RTDSLAM for aDSL or a USAM (fiber node) for VDSL

typically the telco techs and engineers refer to loop length as the defining issue for qualifying aDSL circuit using 15K ft for aDSL and 3K ft for VDSL but as Ive stated before this is a crock, but this just easier for everyoen to use footage

I've personally since loop lengths over 23K ft in cables without interference and cabling that hasnt had many splicing and resplicing issues, typically older cabling that has been spliced creates tons of problems

AT&T's U-Verse and Qwest's VDSL (same thing, just different equipment) is completely different than Verizon's Fios as Fios is a true Fiber to the premise (house) system.

VDSL is a Fiber to a Node or a Hybrid system similar to what the Cable co's use and the higher bandwith and frequencies used as compared to aDSL is even more susceptible ot aDSL's problems, fortunately AT&T is going to or already has started using a 2 pair feed to increase "loop length" ugh theres that term again 😉

Cable has that same problem distance from the node

as the number of amplifiers & cabling resistance typically kills your upload first, and if you're too far you really have an issue as most Coaxial cable that is used is an older 550(ish) MHz rated cable and the typical internet freq is 700MHz um ya it really is rated, but hell you think your cable company is gonna replace it nope, hell most amplifiers arent rated for 700MHz+ either, cheap radio shack splitters that customers like to use because theyre a pretty gold color will cause problems as well, as most arent rated for 700+ MHz and dont have a return path (your upload)

Cable Co's networks are not really designed for uploading as the bottle neck is the frequency that the Modems use to send the signal back to the Node is rather small for bandwidth typically around 54 MHz
 
I'm with Eastlink Cable in Nova Scotia Canada. I have 5mbit/sec download (prob 512kb/sec upload) for around $50/month.

For an extra $10 bucks you can jump to 15mbit down/1mbit up service.
 
Here in Bulgaria i have 50Mbit down and 10Mbit up with fiberoptic to the home for only 15 Euro/month 😉
 
I am from India and my stated connection speed is 2Mbps(down) and most of the time I get around 1.7 - 1.8 Mbps for $12.
 
I have a 1Mbps up and down combined, pay about $50/pm for it and have a 1.5GB cap.

I live in South Africa
 
I have a 3mb/s dsl which gets closer to 1.5mb/s. I am in an office in So CAl and there is no alternative except a T1 for $350 a month. I wish there was some real wireless broadband options. There is no cable in my building, otherwise I would go with cox. No Fios here either.
 
I'm in the UK, I can only get 2mb adsl I see up to 250kb/s download and about 30kb/s up, but most of the time I only see about 150kb/s download. I wish we could get the speeds you are complaining about in the US!!!
 
[citation][nom]Tindytim[/nom]I get 10mb, but it's Charter, so I only have a connection half of the time.[/citation]
At least its not mediacom. One of my work sites had them until I got sick of the bull. Over 12 months it worked for maybe 3 months.
 
Mos of you are lucky I live in south America In Boliva and in here is really a REAP OFF. Companies in here really steel from you. I have 448kbps down and 160kbps up for 49$us. In comparison with other countries next to us wich for the same price you can get form 2mb to 8mb for the same price (Argentina, Chile, Brazil)
 
I can get 1,2MB/s (10mbits), though my ISP caps it at around 6 to 8mbit.
fast enough for me!
Probably not fast enough for people who're with more than 7 computers online per channel!

In 1992 we had a 128kbits up and down (dual ISDN)connection for about 10pc's,and internet worked back then. I'm sure it works now too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.