Archived from groups: microsoft.public.win95.general.discussion (
More info?)
Thank you for your prompt response. I have IE &OE 5.5 from On-Disk.com but,
I am NOT able to install it. It says the SETUP failed!
What should I do?!
"Jeff Richards" <JRichards@msn.com.au> wrote in message
news:%23FCu45JoFHA.1204@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> You first error is caused by the last. Upgrade IE and it will disappear.
>
> A better version of IE will be included in many of your software or
> demonstration CDs, or you could download it from the www. See, for
> instance,
>
http://www.cintek.com/download/ie5.htm
> http://ie5.paradise.net.nz/
>
http://www.corrigo.com/corrigoconnect/InstallationInstructions.htm
>
> Please note that I have not tested any of these sites.
>
> I would guess that upgrading IE will also fix the error with MFC71.
>
> The other message is related to a virus infection. See, for instance:
>
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/dialer.inproc.b.html
>
> Following the removal instructions might get rid of the message.
> --
> Jeff Richards
> MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User)
> "Capt K Ripendran" <ripendra@giasmd01.vsnl.net.in> wrote in message
> news:u%23grIsJoFHA.2152@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> Jeff,
>> Further my Email of 13th Aug, I would like to inform you that I did
>> a SETUP of Windows 95 by going into Command Prompt. Windows NOW opens but
>> the following dialog boxes appear with msgs as under:
>> ERROR STARTING PROGRAM
>> 1. The LOADWC.EXE is linked to missing export SHLWAPI.DLL.WrsprintfA
>> 2. The MFC71.DLL is linked to missing SHLWAPI.DLL.urlunescapeA
>>
>> 3. RUNDLL
>> ERROR loading EGCOMSERVICE_1050.DLL
>> A device attached to the system is not working.
>>
>> Inadvertantly, it has also installed IE & OE 3.1 which came with Windows
>> 95! I would like to know as to how to restore IE & OE 5.5 again?!
>>
>> I will be thankful if you could kindly assist me.
>> Capt K Ripendran
>>
>>
>> "Jeff Richards" <JRichards@msn.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:OmBPuk6nFHA.2772@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>> The stack message is caused by a delay in initializing a device, which
>>> causes the Windows startup procedure to use up the available stack space
>>> before it decides the device isn't going to respond. I am confident
>>> that if you get rid of the first message the second will disappear. Do
>>> not make modifications to Windows startup files while the machine is not
>>> working properly, as any such changes will almost certainly be wrong.
>>>
>>> The boot order will make no difference if there is no other boot media
>>> installed, other than perhaps a delay before loading starts. If you
>>> have got as far as messages from DOS or Windows then the system is
>>> finding a boot device with boot media. The actual sequence is your own
>>> choice. Put the Hard Disk Drive first if you need to be quite sure that
>>> the operating system is booting from the disk. Otherwise, simply check
>>> that you have removed any other bootable media (including CDs and
>>> floppies).
>>>
>>> In problems of this type it can be useful to disable any unneeded
>>> hardware in BIOS setup, so that the Windows start procedure is as simple
>>> as possible.
>>> --
>>> Jeff Richards
>>> MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User)
>>> "Capt K Ripendran" <ripendra@giasmd01.vsnl.net.in> wrote in message
>>> news:OJX6Fc6nFHA.3380@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>>>> Jeff,
>>>> Thank you for your prompt response. The system is NOT low on
>>>> memory
>>>> as it has been working very well! As to the second part of the ERROR
>>>> msg,
>>>> how do I change the STACK setting in CONFIG.SYS file ? Perhaps I had
>>>> changed
>>>> the sequence of the BOOT? What is the sequence - is it CDRom drive, FD
>>>> drive and then the HARD disk?
>>>> Thanking you once again
>>>> Capt K Ripendran
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>