Quick Question?

[critt3r]

Would you fellas go for the 9600XT 256/128 bit interface or the 9700 Pro 128/256 bit interface.

I just want to buy what's best for my gaming dollar.

Thx for any advice I get.

 

[coolsquirtle]

9700pro 256bit! 128bit is just yucky :S

RIP Block Heater....HELLO P4~~~~~
120% nVidia Fanboy+119% Money Fanboy
GeForce 6800 Ultra--> The Way we thought FX 5800Ultra is meant to be played
THGC's resident Asian and nVboy

 

[Crashman]

9700 Pro is faster. 256-bit is faster. 256MB is unecessary. So OF COURSE the 9700 Pro is the better card, probably by around 20%!

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>

 

[Robc1880]

the 9700pro 256 bit is the better choice between the 2.

Remember, there are no stupid questions, just stupid people.

 

[HardWareBoss]

I'll put my 2 cemts in for the 9700Pro.

 

[blackphoenix77]

Come on...just a little more for 9800Pro.

<font color=blue>AthlonXP-M 2500+</font color=blue>
<font color=green>Abit NF7-S</font color=green>
<font color=red>Kingston DDR400 2x256Mb</font color=red>

 

[phial]

the 9700pro with 256bit memory annnnnyyyy day of the week

-------
<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new">please dont click here! </A>
<A HREF="http://www.subhi.com/keyboard.jpg" target="_new">This is you, interweb junky</A>

 

[dhlucke]

The 9700Pro is the best bang for the buck out right now.

<i><font color=blue>Edited by Scamtron on 10/11/01 09:58 PM

 

[ltj311]

You would even recommend it over the 9800nonpro 256-bit? They have just about identical performance but the 9800np has enhanced shaders.

You can get it for under $140. Excellent price/performance.

--
MSI K8N Neo Platinum
Athlon 64 3200+ Newcastle
512mb Apacer pc3200
ATI 9800np 256-bit 128mb