[SOLVED] R5 2400G vs R5 2600 vs R5 3400G vs R5 3500

[thuggamer]

This is a straight question here in my country I am able to afford all of these CPUs but I don't know them performance wise and I'll be pairing them with
GALAX GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC) - 4GB GDDR6 128-bit DP/HDMI/DVI-D
Note that it is the GDDR6 Version and ill be Overclocking the GPU and CPU

This Is The Price List(Approx.)-
R5 3500 - 141.95$
R5 2400G - 125.49$ (With integrated Graphics)(Vega 11)
R5 3400G - 168.93$(With integrated Graphics)(Vega 11)
R5 2600 - 153.39$

So which one of these CPUs will Yeild me the best performance in gaming?
And Will a integrated Graphics give me more frames even when I have a discrete GPU?

Thanks In Advance
Have A Good Day

 

[mitch074]

This is a straight question here in my country I am able to afford all of these CPUs but I don't know them performance wise and I'll be pairing them with
GALAX GeForce GTX 1650 Super EX (1-Click OC) - 4GB GDDR6 128-bit DP/HDMI/DVI-D
Note that it is the GDDR6 Version and ill be Overclocking the GPU and CPU

This Is The Price List(Approx.)-
R5 3500 - 141.95$
R5 2400G - 125.49$ (With integrated Graphics)(Vega 11)
R5 3400G - 168.93$(With integrated Graphics)(Vega 11)
R5 2600 - 153.39$

So which one of these CPUs will Yeild me the best performance in gaming?
And Will a integrated Graphics give me more frames even when I have a discrete GPU?

Thanks In Advance
Have A Good Day

The 3500 would have the most performance in current games, but the 2600 is more versatile. Forget the G variants with a discrete GPU, it would be unused.
I would get the 2600, or scrape together enough cash to get a 3600.

 

[mdd1963]

As you are getting a discrete GPU, paying extra for any "G" series CPU is unneeded.

If the R5-3600 is too steep in asking price, get the R5-2600....

 

[thuggamer]

As you are getting a discrete GPU, paying extra for any "G" series CPU is unneeded.

If the R5-3600 is too steep in asking price, get the R5-2600....

So then what about the X variant of 2600 which costs around 183.81$, Is it significantly better than 2600?

 

[ChumP]

So then what about the X variant of 2600 which costs around 183.81$, Is it significantly better than 2600?

On the X variant the cooler is a bit better and it has higher base and boost clock.

In my eyes the $30 premium is not worth it because you can OC the 2600 with the included cooler to match the 2600X performance effortlessly.

 

[thuggamer]

Thanks So I'm going for the 2600

 

[mitch074]

Thanks So I'm going for the 2600

Make sure your case is well ventilated if you want to OC it - the boxed cooler is good but not great, it will only support overclock in a "cold" environment.
Overclocking on Zen is usually only a matter of enabling Precision Boost Overdrive (PBO) as it brings the most efficient overclock, but even then I only recommend to do it only if you find you need it.

 

[thuggamer]

Make sure your case is well ventilated if you want to OC it - the boxed cooler is good but not great, it will only support overclock in a "cold" environment.
Overclocking on Zen is usually only a matter of enabling Precision Boost Overdrive (PBO) as it brings the most efficient overclock, but even then I only recommend to do it only if you find you need it.

So I will oc only if I need it
At first let me see the performance and depending upon that I'll do the rest
Thank u guys

 

[xravenxdota]

I got the R 5 2600.I did oc it at start.It matched the 2600x but....It's really not worth it for what i do.Everything i run,runs on 100+fps(mostly action rpg games)The 2600 are the budget king for a reason.

 

[punkncat]

IMO, if you want to play with OC don't pay for the 'X' variant. If you are looking for the best out of box, don't mess with it performance that AMD binned it for, the X is worth having to a degree.