I'm afraid I really can't see the point of reviewing devices like this at all if you're not going to provide a comparison with high-end air-cooling.
At $250 - $300, the CoolIT coolers aren't competing against air coolers, they're competing against water coolers.
I always find it funny how fashonable it's become to bash Tom's.
Instead of walking away with a bit of useful info - like the fact that we've compared the CoolIT solutions against comperably priced water cooling, which nobody else has bothered trying - our forums are filled with readers who a) obviously find enough value in our investigations to spend the time reading our stuff, and then b) invest even more time on the forums to complain about what we didn't do.
It'd be nice if we got a little support from our own community like other sites. Constructive criticism would probably work a little better as far as letting us know what you want to see instead of posts like "Toms=RIP". I mean, seriously.
forums are to speak the truth - why did tom's let such a poor product slide with a ok review?
advertising dollars?
big business relationships?
THG - rocks! this article sucks!
the coolit system is a terrible product that serves no purpose - again - yes it works on low watt chips but why would you need such in efficient cooling?
it complete fails to cool high end chips - so what purpose can this product serve? what role?
i own one and its total junk and its so obvious, why can THG noT come to that same conclusion? if i am wrong then explain to me who would use this useless over-hyped inefficient product?
THG ROCKS! ITS A GREAT SITE!