They went down this path before. Windows XP was actually short for "Windows eXPerience". The idea was one version of windows that's continuously updated and enhanced with new features. XP was supposed to be a modular OS, sorta like what Google did with Android. Move as much of the non-core functionality out of the OS distribution and make it part of an software distribution service that's independent of the OS. At the time, the independent software distribution service was windows update (notice how you could, if you opt in, get other Microsoft software on windows update like Defender, Security essentials, Windows (Live) essentials, Bing desktop/toolbar, etc). Today it would be the new Microsoft (App) Store.
Well, 2002 wasn't really the best time for such an idea... 2015 however, sounds a bit more viable. I see 2 implications from this decision. Either Windows is moving towards a monthly/yearly licensing agreement (What Microsoft thought of doing back with XP), or Windows is moving towards being free. For something to be continuously updated, they can't just sell you one license for life, it all comes down to how worried Microsoft is about marketshare. This will be interesting...
They went down this path before. Windows XP was actually short for "Windows eXPerience". The idea was one version of windows that's continuously updated and enhanced with new features. XP was supposed to be a modular OS, sorta like what Google did with Android. Move as much of the non-core functionality out of the OS distribution and make it part of an software distribution service that's independent of the OS. At the time, the independent software distribution service was windows update (notice how you could, if you opt in, get other Microsoft software on windows update like Defender, Security essentials, Windows (Live) essentials, Bing desktop/toolbar, etc). Today it would be the new Microsoft (App) Store.
Well, 2002 wasn't really the best time for such an idea... 2015 however, sounds a bit more viable. I see 2 implications from this decision. Either Windows is moving towards a monthly/yearly licensing agreement (What Microsoft thought of doing back with XP), or Windows is moving towards being free. For something to be continuously updated, they can't just sell you one license for life, it all comes down to how worried Microsoft is about marketshare. This will be interesting...