Nah, it idles lower and the cooler ran hotter. I know it's accurate, I have tested 2 other FX-8150s with other coolers. I'm more worried about my Ryzen temps. The architecture on FX CPU's is bigger too, which effects required cooling.
The Temp readings are inaccurate on FX up until around 40C - 45C, I've ran a FX8320 at 5.2ghz for 5 years, I also have 3 other FX systems, FX6300, FX 4350, FX8300, A CPU can not idle lower than room temp, its physically not possible, even in it's lowest power state available to it. So any readings below 40C on any FX cpu's, I'd take with a grain of salt, you can't compare, You can how ever get the socket temps as that is off the motherboard, Ryzen is a bit more accurate than FX ever was and even then its still got inaccuracy issues at lower temps due to how AMD gets its temps readings, its all estimated to keep it short.
Why would my 5.2ghz FX 8 core, idle around 15C on a water cooler when the TDP is around 290+watts, I keep the room at around 70F or 21C. Makes so sense for something to use energy yet run cooler than the air surrounding it.
As mentioned above, The temps is in its safe zone, idle temps really don't mean a whole lot as the cooler will lower its fan speeds or pump speeds during no load, So you could possible have a higher idle temp than a person with a different cooler but same CPU. My Ryzen 7 1700 system idles around 50c at 4.2ghz, though the air cooler the fans are only at 500rpm up until around 60c when it jumps to 1800rpm or more, Max temps with Aida64 is around 76c on that chip when the cooler speeds its fans to 2000+ rpm.