Samsung shows off industry's first 512GB RDIMM memory module.
Samsung Develops 512GB DDR5 Module with HKMG DDR5 Chips : Read more
Samsung Develops 512GB DDR5 Module with HKMG DDR5 Chips : Read more
The scheduled forum maintenance has now been completed. If you spot any issues, please report them here in this thread. Thank you!
This will be amazing for servers. When it comes to virtualization, you are almost always more RAM limited that CPU limited. Over provisioning on CPU is SOP when it comes to virtualization. However, doing that for RAM can cause MAJOR performance impacts.This is probably great for servers but not really that useful if those chips fit into normal computers. There are only a few games out there that use more than 16GB of ram right now so 512GB might be a tinytiny bit too much. 🤣
I went with 16GB RAM in my current desktop when I built it in 2013. At that time 4GB was common, 8GB was high end, and 16GB was extreme. Push forward a few years and I maxed out my desktop at 32GB RAM. Now in 2021 we see 4GB as unusable, 8GB minimum, 16GB main stream, and 32GB extreme. I can tell you that if you have your computer for long enough Windows gets bloated and uses more and more RAM. Right now I have 7 Firefox tabs open, Slack, Outlook, and a VPN running and my desktop is using 9GB RAM with another 3GB used for cache. I've found that once you get to 32GB RAM Windows goes and expands everything into RAM which means it doesn't have to go to disk for many system files. This increases responsiveness of the system. My next desktop will have 64GB RAM due to needed that extra RAM for being a VMware Home Lab.Obviously you're right, but just a few years ago people were saying 8GB RAM was enough and 16GB was just not needed. As VR becomes better, RAM will be even more important.
Technology is increasing at an ever increasing rate. Who knows what we'll need in another decade?
First DOS computer I used was a 486 DX33 with 8MB RAM. My first computer had a 200MHz P5 with 16MB RAM running Win95. That Win95 computer needed more RAM as it tended to go to disk quite a bit.Never say never.
My first PC had a 100 MHz P5 and 8 MB of ram. Doesn't seem all that long ago.
At the time I got my first PC, Pentium 133 and 16MB of RAM, and a whopping 2.5GB hard drive, my friends thought it was somewhat extravagant, and nicknamed the machine "Ah-nuld."Never say never.
My first PC had a 100 MHz P5 and 8 MB of ram. Doesn't seem all that long ago.
Never say never.
My first PC had a 100 MHz P5 and 8 MB of ram. Doesn't seem all that long ago.
Never say never.
My first PC had a 100 MHz P5 and 8 MB of ram. Doesn't seem all that long ago.
remember the big joke in config.sys?386DX 20MHz, 1 MB RAM DOS 5.0. It was fun messing with the config.sys and tweeking the upper memory to load all the drivers.
I must be ancient. First computer I used only had 2k RAM. Then I upgraded to a computer with 64k RAM and a processor speed of 1 MHz. I can remember friends paying $1000 dollars for 32 Megs of RAM. My current machine has 32 Gigs of RAM. I regularly use 12 to 20 Gigs. Next computer will either have 32 again or 64 if the price is low enough.
I do! 😀remember the big joke in config.sys?
Bugs=OFF
LOL
I am glad those days are over. stuff was medieval
First DOS computer I used was a 486 DX33 with 8MB RAM. My first computer had a 200MHz P5 with 16MB RAM running Win95. That Win95 computer needed more RAM as it tended to go to disk quite a bit.
I must be ancient. First computer I used only had 2k RAM. Then I upgraded to a computer with 64k RAM and a processor speed of 1 MHz. I can remember friends paying $1000 dollars for 32 Megs of RAM. My current machine has 32 Gigs of RAM. I regularly use 12 to 20 Gigs. Next computer will either have 32 again or 64 if the price is low enough.
At the time I got my first PC, Pentium 133 and 16MB of RAM, and a whopping 2.5GB hard drive, my friends thought it was somewhat extravagant, and nicknamed the machine "Ah-nuld."
And that was only . . uh . . NONE OF YOUR DAMN BUSINESS years ago. 😆
That computer also had a 120MB HDD, a 750MB HDD was added later, and a 2MB ISA VGA card. Eventually we had an external 1X CD-ROM drive for that computer as well. It lasted for quite a long time. It ran everything I had for games quite well except Duke 3D. That had a min CPU of a 486 DX66. There were a lot of framerate drops but it was the mid 90s so you didn't care.Your computer was a DX33? Amazing! My first was 486 SX33 and only had 4MB RAM. Your first system was a beast!
The weird thing about that time was I played with all the programs like crazy because there were only a certain number of them to use. That really helped at my first real job because I was the only guy in the building who knew Dos 6.2, Win 3.1, Win95 and 98 settings by heart.
That computer also had a 120MB HDD, a 750MB HDD was added later, and a 2MB ISA VGA card. Eventually we had an external 1X CD-ROM drive for that computer as well. It lasted for quite a long time. It ran everything I had for games quite well except Duke 3D. That had a min CPU of a 486 DX66. There were a lot of framerate drops but it was the mid 90s so you didn't care.
On that old system it was probably 24-30fps when not a lot was going on the screen. As soon as more enemies showed up it would be like 15-20fps and explosions dropped it to 5-10fps. Again since it didn't stay at 5-10fps you didn't care.I remember the earliest days where 15fps was considered the absolute bare minimum playable frame rate! laughs 30fps was considered great and 60 was unbelievable. Most were just happy to get 30fps+ in Quake with GLide
Whoa, a 2.5 GB harddrive ... I remember trying to save up $20,000 for a 5 Meg harddrive when I was 12. By the time I had saved up $2000, the price had dropped to $5000, but by then I wanted a car.