I saw an empty post at 9:38AM. I interpreted that as a snub. I missed your follow-up post because it was not addressed to me. Sorry.I replied to your post on Thursday at 9.43. With references. Scroll back and you will see it.
I take exception to your unwarrented personal remarks fzabkar. You are most offensive in your attitude. You need to grow up and learn some courtesy. Non of your presumptions are justified and your childish partisanship is entirely out of place in discussing this topic.
I now see you have quoted a post by "Hyram". It's still just technobabble. Moreover, Hyram's final statement is complete and utter garbage. It's a bizarre concoction of an overactive imagination.
- Until Apple can implement an intelligent TRIM system — one that can respond to the SSD’s built in characteristics data and adjust its own timings to match, as Windows does — then the only safe, reliable non-factory SSD you can trust with Mac OS X is Intel’s X-25 series. Everything else dies after six to ten months’ regular use.
I would prefer to see an authoritative reference, eg one that comes from Apple or an SSD manufacturer.
One thing is true about Apple -- it uses proprietary interfaces in its earlier models to prevent its captive users from installing less expensive third-party SSDs. To me, that is an unconscionable practice. Locking TRIM support to Apple supplied SSDs is just another way to cripple these third-party SSDs and make Apple's SSDs look better. That's yet another unconscionable practice.
BTW, if you believe Apple is above crippling the performance of its products ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batterygate
Last edited: