Okay, I am getting slightly intruiged here, even though I tend to care about extreme overclocking about as little as I do about tuna fishing.. But since tuna fishing is big fun, so lets see..
>His is NOT CAPABLE OF GIVING THOSE NUMBERS....they'll say
>that. In fact, the only system that CAN do that is an
>Opteron system with NUMA enabled.
I'm a noob here, so help me out. What is exactly is not possible ?
*) I see mozart has screenies that seem to indicate a 347 Mhz memory clock. Are you saying that is impossible (honest question, I really dont know) ? Isn't that only slightly better than what DDR2 667 should reach anyhow ?
*) Assuming that is possible, do you think the 4/4/4/12 latency settings are impossible (at that frequency ?) Again, honest question. If you tell me 1/1/1/3 is possible I'll believe you, cause I don't know this stuff
*) Assuming both clockspeed and latency are plausable for a pair of highend DDR2 modules, do his results match with what you could expect ? If not, I'd appreciate some examples or comparable overclocks and their score, so we could look close what exactly is not likely or possible.
BTW, I noticed his <A HREF="http://www.overclock.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=6010" target="_new"> first screenshot </A> has a few comparison numbers, some of which are even higher...so how impossible would Mozarts scores be then ?
For the record, I really don't have an opinion on this; true or not true, significant or not.. .? The only opinion that I *do* have, is that *IF* mozart would go through all this trouble and is just lying through his teeth, well, I can only feel terribly sorry for him. Even more than I already do for someone that is kept up at night because of some almost meling molten sand benchmark results and the opinion on it of people he never met and most likely never will meet. And much more than for someone that is so stressed that he just managed to stick a pair of siccors through his hand 😉
= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =