Steam Family Library Sharing Now Available to Share Games

Status
Not open for further replies.

tobalaz

Honorable
Jun 26, 2012
276
0
10,780
About flipping time.There's no reason I shouldn't be able to play a game on my laptop while my nephew is playing one on my desktop or vice versa.This is long overdue.
 

Benthon

Distinguished
Oct 1, 2010
257
0
18,780
I find this feature to be absolutely awesome! My girlfriend's steam library is pretty lackluster (like 10 games?) and mine has a couple hundred. Now she can enjoy The Walking Dead or Skyrim without me having to be off of Steam. Yay!
 

Mike Friesen

Honorable
Apr 10, 2013
310
0
10,860


Well, you still can't be playing the same game at the same time, can you? Maybe i'm wrong, but i thought that's how it worked. so for multiplayer games...
 


Ahh, I might very well have jumped to assumptions here. It's still a cool feature, either way. :)
 
You all need to READ the steam FAQ as every comment above is completely wrong. ALL this does is allow them to take control of your library without your password. Its almost completely useless and you can't both be playing games from your library. Not the same game, the ENTIRE library. You access it they get kicked.

http://store.steampowered.com/sharing/

Can two users share a library and both play at the same time?

No, a shared library may only be accessed by one user at a time.

When I authorize a device to lend my library to others, do I limit my own ability to access and play my games?

As the account holder, you may always access and play your games at any time. If you decide to start playing when another user is already playing one of your games, he/she will be given a few minutes to either purchase the game or quit playing.

Sometimes the games I’ve been given access to are unavailable for me to play. Why?

Shared games are only available on devices that have been authorized by the account holder. Shared games will be unavailable on even an authorized device when the account holder’s library is currently in use on another computer.
 

tomfreak

Distinguished
May 18, 2011
1,334
0
19,280
few people here didnt READ LOL"According to the FAQ, libraries are shared and borrowed in their entirety: you can’t share just one or two games. Unfortunately, not all games can be shared to friends and family due to “technical limitations”.
 

IndignantSkeptic

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2011
507
0
18,980
If Steam did proper game sharing then the price of the games would become multiple times higher and people who don't have people to share with would be essentially getting robbed by sharers.
 

TwistedDruid

Honorable
Jan 2, 2014
34
0
10,530
I find this feature to be absolutely awesome! My girlfriend's steam library is pretty lackluster (like 10 games?) and mine has a couple hundred. Now she can enjoy The Walking Dead or Skyrim without me having to be off of Steam. Yay!
There is a great work around for this. I have been in the beta for a while and have my girlfriend and two friends on my account. All of them can play but the moment I get on it locks it out for them. BUT if they switch to off line mode after installing the game they can play as much as they want and I can still access my games. It works out great for games like Fallout 3 having all three of them play it. But games like borderlands they will require their own copy to play with the main account but the secondary accounts can play together.
 
lol. your "great workaround" is an obvious exploitation of how this VERY limited scheme is supposed to work. it us useless for most steam users and at best a marketing demo. it you insist on sharing your "fix" it will shortly be fixed. no sane publisher would allow your abuse once they saw it
 

Marcus52

Distinguished
Jun 11, 2008
619
0
19,010
I was excited - for 1 minute. Then I read more.This kind of thing is one of the reasons I don't care for Steam. For a service that has been around as long as it has it is simply poorly implemented. Their servers are terrible for playing co-op on. Their update process is slow - I often buy a game from Green Man Gaming before Steam even has it available. But then of course I have to use the code on Steam because game publishers love the service.I guess they are good at one thing, and that is managing DRM. (I wasn't impressed though when I bought a game through Steam and had to go through Microsoft Live as well as Steam to play it. Steam should have handled that process for me.)Good news for people interested in a Steam box (Why would you want something you can only play OpenCL games on? You can play DirectX AND OpenCL games on Windows.), they don't make the machines, they just make the OS, so there is one less part of that equation Steam will screw up.
 
OK Marcus you are an idiot. Steam I very well implemented. the best platform on the market. that's why everyone sells THEIR codes.

Microsoft live/ubisoft pluggin crap is mandated by the publisher. you are FORCED to use it by them. no matter where you buy it. Yes it is BS and trash and no one wants it but then talk to/about the pubkisher
 

hoofhearted

Distinguished
Apr 9, 2004
1,020
0
19,280
I find this feature to be absolutely awesome! My girlfriend's steam library is pretty lackluster (like 10 games?) and mine has a couple hundred. Now she can enjoy The Walking Dead or Skyrim without me having to be off of Steam. Yay!
There is a great work around for this. I have been in the beta for a while and have my girlfriend and two friends on my account. All of them can play but the moment I get on it locks it out for them. BUT if they switch to off line mode after installing the game they can play as much as they want and I can still access my games. It works out great for games like Fallout 3 having all three of them play it. But games like borderlands they will require their own copy to play with the main account but the secondary accounts can play together.
You don't need the family plan to do this.
 

stevejnb

Honorable
May 6, 2013
609
0
10,980
Ok Valve, where's my invisible mode? I can't sign on to play Civilization with one of my buddies without my nephews pestering me to play with them instead, getting upset when I decline. Services have been doing this for years - why aren't you?
 


It doesn't have invisible mode, but you can just sign out of the chat service. Not quite perfect, but it's something.
 

Kaisfreedom

Reputable
Mar 3, 2014
4
0
4,510
Hi, I have some questions.Is the shared library means the whole library or just one game?Can my friend/family play other game while I play the other game within shared library?
 

IndignantSkeptic

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2011
507
0
18,980


I think you mean OpenGL; not OpenCL. Will there ever be any actual games that use OpenCL? I think it might be superseded by something else.
 

stevejnb

Honorable
May 6, 2013
609
0
10,980
play Civilization with one of my buddies without my nephews pestering me to play with them instead, getting upset when I decline. Services have been doing this for years - why aren't you?[/quotemsg]

It doesn't have invisible mode, but you can just sign out of the chat service. Not quite perfect, but it's something.
[/quotemsg]

Sign out of chat mode? Could you explain this more? I've been following a frequently updated "Why no invisible mode?" type thread in the official Steam Forums and I've never seen someone post this as a solution. Can I play multiplayer while out of chat mode, and can everyone see what I'm doing while playing multiplayer? Thanks.

Based on a few initial searches I've done, my guess is what you're suggesting is just going into offline mode. For multiplayer, this is *not* a solution.
 

IndignantSkeptic

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2011
507
0
18,980


The more you help people with this exploit then the more you and the exploiters will rob the non-exploiters. I've already explained how, so I'm not going to repeat it.
 
And so it begins random 13 year olds invite you on Steam and beg you to share your games... Sorry friend time to start washing cars and putting things on your wish list for sales no freebies on my side, block, next!
 

68vistacruiser

Distinguished
Jan 22, 2009
100
0
18,680
It seems to me that the term "shared" is incorrect. "Borrowed" accurately describes what they're allowing you to do. It seems like this is just some marketing BS to get more people to sign on without reading the fine print. My two kids and I each have a Steam account. If I can't "share" one game while I play another, then all I'm really doing is allowing them to sign on to my account on their computer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.