[citation][nom]thedokok[/nom]Bustapr, an open experience is not automatically better than a 'limited' one, especially where the limitations aren't all that limiting.I find linux more limiting than windows, even though it is 'open'. When I jump on a linux machine, it may not even be running the same GUI as the linux machine next to it, which is a PITA. Linux is open, but it doesn't have the calibe of apps that I need to get my job done, there is currently no alternative to Photoshop for professional use, and it isn't available on Linux, and that goes for quite a few other tools. Gimp, Open Office etc. are okay for home or mild use, but don't cut it for people that really have to use productivity programs in a deep way to make a living. Open systems have advantages, but they also have disadvantages. For example, if you buy a current model android phone or tablet, you can't be sure it will run all the apps, or that they will run the way they are intended to run. Being able to download a program to your phone from anywhere also opens you up to malware and attacks much more than in a closed system. I for one don't need that worry on my phone, it is annoying enough on my PC, but there the advantages outweigh the annoyance.Open is open, which is great, but that doesn't automatically mean more or better choices, or a better experience for the end user.[/citation]
Well, sorry to say it but a few things I gather. You know nothing about Linux other than there is no Photoshop. You love your Windoz...which is fine obviously. You missed the point of what openness vs closed is...
I just can't believe you refered to Linux having different GUIs as more limiting than Windows...and in terms of 'openness'...just...speechless.