Maybe if you get a non mmx and non sse version of super pi then yes it would work 😀 (btw how fast was the commodore's proc? and how much ram did it have?)Yes, my C-64 still works. It wont run super pi. 🙁
Hey Conroe, are you using a VIA MVP3 chipset or what? 8O
It has a 6510, realy just a 6502 with bank switching because it had 64k ram and could switch in another 4k of rom with MS basic. As I remember it has a clock of 2mhz. It's one of the best computers yet with it's life of well over 10 years. It never realy got upgrades, but programers got better and better. Now programers are lazy and depend too much on hardware to do their job for them.
Hey Conroe, are you using a VIA MVP3 chipset or what? 8O
Geez my sempron gets better times than that! (1 minute and 10 seconds on 1 million digits)i get 1.16 (that is one minute and 16 seconds) on a 2.2Ghz P4.
I am aching for a new computer
Good action man! Conroe and Joe show us some benchies!![]()
My spare machine that folds. It can do 56 seconds without heaps of crap running.
Thank you endyen 😀Just for you, I slapped together a K6-2 500, with 64 megs of ram, and a very old 2 gig hdd (win98, old install), on a gigabyte GA 5AA mobo.
1 m time 7 mniutes and 31 sec. The only serial mouse I still have, is a little broken.
Then tell me how do i do a screen shot?You know what.... this has to stop from now on... any posts made need to post a screenshot to prove it...
I keep seeing 28s etc... well funny that my 3.2GHz rig can barely hit those numbers.
(Athlon64 X2 4800+ @ 3.2GHz).
Anything lower then 34s on the rigs you guys are posting seems like total bullox to me. A 2.5GHz A64 can't hit those digi's. If you wish to contest it then post a screenshot... cuz I'm not believing some of the numbers being posted here.
FYI.. an Athlon64 3200+ Socket 939 oc'ed to 2.4GHz get's 36s. Therefore I fail to see how the same CPU oc'ed to 2.5GHz can get 28s like some here are claiming.
I amnot sure if you can run that algorytham on 16bit C64 CPU.does anybody here have an old Commodore...??? :lol: I'd like to see what Pi times on that are, just for laughs :lol:
I amnot sure if you can run that algorytham on 16bit C64 CPU.does anybody here have an old Commodore...??? :lol: I'd like to see what Pi times on that are, just for laughs :lol:
You know what.... this has to stop from now on... any posts made need to post a screenshot to prove it...
I keep seeing 28s etc... well funny that my 3.2GHz rig can barely hit those numbers.
(Athlon64 X2 4800+ @ 3.2GHz).
Anything lower then 34s on the rigs you guys are posting seems like total bullox to me. A 2.5GHz A64 can't hit those digi's. If you wish to contest it then post a screenshot... cuz I'm not believing some of the numbers being posted here.
FYI.. an Athlon64 3200+ Socket 939 oc'ed to 2.4GHz get's 36s. Therefore I fail to see how the same CPU oc'ed to 2.5GHz can get 28s like some here are claiming.
It is 16bit, has 16bit addressing, has 16bit registers and executes 16bit operations. How is it 8bit?The 6510 is a 8bit CPU, just like the 6502 in the Apple ][. It has a 16bit address bus so it can only access 64k of memory at one time. It has a totaly different instruction set than the 8086(16bit, x86) that was in the PCs at the time. AMD made some of those for Intel, and later stole the design and made there own. AMD and Intel settled out of court. Before that Zilog had stole it and used it with their Z-80.