Taunt Marvel Comics

[Shadows]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:

> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws coming
> out of their hands.

Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
same expression as a Marvel comic book character.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:

> On 2005-03-16, Bateau <Gamera@work.stomping.aza> wrote:
>
>> That's what I meant.
>> They're false claws. Where else do you expect claws to be?
>> Ninjas have been doing it for centuries.
>
> Yeah Ninja should be sueing. Maybe I'll represent them.

Ninjas are cool. And by cool, I mean totally sweet. The purpose of a ninja
is to flip out and kill people.

--

Knight37 - http://knightgames.blogspot.com

Once a Gamer, Always a Gamer.

 

[Shadows]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
> shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>
>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws
>>> coming out of their hands.
>>
>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>
> Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is violating
> Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD writer maker is
> responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some movie or game.

Read the EULA from Cryptic. Cryptic will claim ownership of
anything you create in the game. It only takes ONE player to make
Wolverine given the different customes possible and Cryptic now
is claiming ownership of a Wolverine clone which it can put in
its monthly comic book.

Not good.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>
>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws
>>> coming out of their hands.
>>
>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>
>Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is violating
>Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD writer maker is
>responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some movie or game.

In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
legitimate use it's legal.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:

> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>> shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>>
>>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with
>>>> claws coming out of their hands.
>>>
>>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>>
>> Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is
>> violating Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD
>> writer maker is responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some
>> movie or game.
>
> Read the EULA from Cryptic. Cryptic will claim ownership of
> anything you create in the game. It only takes ONE player to make
> Wolverine given the different customes possible and Cryptic now
> is claiming ownership of a Wolverine clone which it can put in
> its monthly comic book.
>
> Not good.

Again, this is irrelevant to the lawsuit with Marvel. First of all, just
because Cryptic claims something in a EULA doesn't make it law. Secondly,
if Cryptic took someone's Wolverine clone from their game made and
published it in their comic book, then AT THAT TIME they *might* be in
violation of Marvel's IP, for publishing the comic book, NOT FOR THEIR
CHARACTER GENERATOR! And "wolverine clone" would of course have to be
defined by the court, and not just "superhero with claws".


--

Knight37 - http://knightgames.blogspot.com

Once a Gamer, Always a Gamer.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:59:06 +0800, Bateau wrote:

> Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>>
>>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws
>>>> coming out of their hands.
>>>
>>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>>
>>Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is violating
>>Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD writer maker is
>>responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some movie or game.
>
> In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
> legitimate use it's legal.

I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it did
exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
suing.
--
RJB
3/21/2005 8:34:34 AM

By the time (the Leaning Tower of Pisa) was 10% built, everyone knew it
would be a total disaster. But the investment was so big they felt
compelled to go on. Since its completion, it cost a fortune to maintain and
is still in danger of collapsing. There are no plans to replace it, since
it was never needed in the first place. I expect every installation has its
own pet software which is analogous to the above.
-Ken Iverson

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> once tried to test me with:

>> In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
>> legitimate use it's legal.
>
> I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it did
> exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
> suing.

He's probably refering to the 1984 Supreme Court case Sony vs. Universal
where the court ruled that the makers of the Betamax (and by association,
the VCR), which had a legitimate purpose other than pirating movies, were
not responsible for illegal uses of that tool.

I mean, it's common sense. We don't go after gun makers because you can use
them to murder people.

--

Knight37 - http://knightgames.blogspot.com

Once a Gamer, Always a Gamer.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

On 21 Mar 2005 23:29:56 GMT, Knight37 wrote:

> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> once tried to test me with:
>
>>> In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
>>> legitimate use it's legal.
>>
>> I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it did
>> exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>> suing.
>
> He's probably refering to the 1984 Supreme Court case Sony vs. Universal
> where the court ruled that the makers of the Betamax (and by association,
> the VCR), which had a legitimate purpose other than pirating movies, were
> not responsible for illegal uses of that tool.
Ah, I misread him

> I mean, it's common sense. We don't go after gun makers because you can use
> them to murder people.
Before the House passed the ban on lawsuits against gunmakers there were
several cases brought against gunmakers. Bushmaster even paid out for the
DC sniper case:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8763-2004Sep9.html

--
RJB
3/22/2005 8:20:55 AM

"Why is it that everything today has to do with things either going in or
coming out of my ass???"
--Eric Cartman (South Park)

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:59:06 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>
>> Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>>>
>>>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws
>>>>> coming out of their hands.
>>>>
>>>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>>>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>>>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>>>
>>>Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is violating
>>>Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD writer maker is
>>>responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some movie or game.
>>
>> In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
>> legitimate use it's legal.
>
>I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it did
>exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>suing.

It's the decision that judges have made in probably every single such
case. Dumbass.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:47:20 +0800, Bateau wrote:

> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:59:06 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>
>>> Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws
>>>>>> coming out of their hands.
>>>>>
>>>>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>>>>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>>>>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>>>>
>>>>Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is violating
>>>>Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD writer maker is
>>>>responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some movie or game.
>>>
>>> In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
>>> legitimate use it's legal.
>>
>>I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it did
>>exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>>suing.
>
> It's the decision that judges have made in probably every single such
> case. Dumbass.

It *still* doesn't preclude them from suing. Dumbass.
--
RJB
3/22/2005 8:46:32 AM

"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human
history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila."
-Mitch Ratliffe

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:47:20 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>
>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:59:06 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>
>>>> Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws
>>>>>>> coming out of their hands.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>>>>>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>>>>>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is violating
>>>>>Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD writer maker is
>>>>>responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some movie or game.
>>>>
>>>> In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
>>>> legitimate use it's legal.
>>>
>>>I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it did
>>>exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>>>suing.
>>
>> It's the decision that judges have made in probably every single such
>> case. Dumbass.
>
>It *still* doesn't preclude them from suing. Dumbass.

That STILL doesn't make it illegal. Dumbass.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:43:45 +0800, Bateau wrote:

> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:47:20 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>
>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:59:06 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws
>>>>>>>> coming out of their hands.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>>>>>>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>>>>>>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is violating
>>>>>>Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD writer maker is
>>>>>>responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some movie or game.
>>>>>
>>>>> In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
>>>>> legitimate use it's legal.
>>>>
>>>>I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it did
>>>>exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>>>>suing.
>>>
>>> It's the decision that judges have made in probably every single such
>>> case. Dumbass.
>>
>>It *still* doesn't preclude them from suing. Dumbass.
>
> That STILL doesn't make it illegal. Dumbass.

Where did I say it was illegal? Being legal or not does *not* preclude a
lawsuit. Dumbass.
--
RJB
3/23/2005 8:26:44 AM

A low voter turnout is an indication of fewer people going to the polls.
--Dan Quayle

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:43:45 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>
>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:47:20 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>
>>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:59:06 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws
>>>>>>>>> coming out of their hands.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>>>>>>>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>>>>>>>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is violating
>>>>>>>Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD writer maker is
>>>>>>>responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some movie or game.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
>>>>>> legitimate use it's legal.
>>>>>
>>>>>I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it did
>>>>>exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>>>>>suing.
>>>>
>>>> It's the decision that judges have made in probably every single such
>>>> case. Dumbass.
>>>
>>>It *still* doesn't preclude them from suing. Dumbass.
>>
>> That STILL doesn't make it illegal. Dumbass.
>
>Where did I say it was illegal? Being legal or not does *not* preclude a
>lawsuit. Dumbass.

When you argued against my statement that it's legal. Dumbass.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:55:16 +0800, Bateau wrote:

> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:43:45 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>
>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:47:20 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:59:06 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws
>>>>>>>>>> coming out of their hands.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>>>>>>>>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>>>>>>>>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is violating
>>>>>>>>Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD writer maker is
>>>>>>>>responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some movie or game.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
>>>>>>> legitimate use it's legal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it did
>>>>>>exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>>>>>>suing.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's the decision that judges have made in probably every single such
>>>>> case. Dumbass.
>>>>
>>>>It *still* doesn't preclude them from suing. Dumbass.
>>>
>>> That STILL doesn't make it illegal. Dumbass.
>>
>>Where did I say it was illegal? Being legal or not does *not* preclude a
>>lawsuit. Dumbass.
>
> When you argued against my statement that it's legal. Dumbass.

Well where did you show me the code? Where did I say it was illegal? I
said: "I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it
did exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
suing." So just *how* exactly did I argue against it? I said I'd like the
see the code. Dumbass.
--
RJB
3/24/2005 8:32:02 AM

While we may not be able to control all that happens to us, we can control
what happens inside us.
--Benjamin Franklin

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

"RJB" <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1gwtzfx290hw3.dlg@ID-221573.user.individual.net...
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:55:16 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>
>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:43:45 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>
>>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:47:20 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
....
>>>>>> <*> Dumbass.
>>>>>
>>>>><*> Dumbass.
>>>>
>>>> <*> Dumbass.
>>>
>>><*> Dumbass.
>>
>> <*> Dumbass.
>
> <*> Dumbass.

This is like an episode of Super Milk Chan.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:55:16 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>
>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:43:45 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>
>>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:47:20 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:59:06 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws
>>>>>>>>>>> coming out of their hands.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>>>>>>>>>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>>>>>>>>>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is violating
>>>>>>>>>Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD writer maker is
>>>>>>>>>responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some movie or game.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
>>>>>>>> legitimate use it's legal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it did
>>>>>>>exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>>>>>>>suing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's the decision that judges have made in probably every single such
>>>>>> case. Dumbass.
>>>>>
>>>>>It *still* doesn't preclude them from suing. Dumbass.
>>>>
>>>> That STILL doesn't make it illegal. Dumbass.
>>>
>>>Where did I say it was illegal? Being legal or not does *not* preclude a
>>>lawsuit. Dumbass.
>>
>> When you argued against my statement that it's legal. Dumbass.
>
>Well where did you show me the code? Where did I say it was illegal? I
>said: "I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it
>did exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>suing." So just *how* exactly did I argue against it? I said I'd like the
>see the code. Dumbass.

Stupid bitch. Where did I say I got it from the USC? That's not a big
list of things that ARE legal you idiot. Why don't you show me where it
says that it's illegal?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:03:06 +0800, Bateau wrote:

> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:55:16 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>
>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:43:45 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:47:20 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:59:06 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws
>>>>>>>>>>>> coming out of their hands.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>>>>>>>>>>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>>>>>>>>>>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is violating
>>>>>>>>>>Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD writer maker is
>>>>>>>>>>responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some movie or game.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
>>>>>>>>> legitimate use it's legal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it did
>>>>>>>>exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>>>>>>>>suing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's the decision that judges have made in probably every single such
>>>>>>> case. Dumbass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It *still* doesn't preclude them from suing. Dumbass.
>>>>>
>>>>> That STILL doesn't make it illegal. Dumbass.
>>>>
>>>>Where did I say it was illegal? Being legal or not does *not* preclude a
>>>>lawsuit. Dumbass.
>>>
>>> When you argued against my statement that it's legal. Dumbass.
>>
>>Well where did you show me the code? Where did I say it was illegal? I
>>said: "I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it
>>did exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>>suing." So just *how* exactly did I argue against it? I said I'd like the
>>see the code. Dumbass.
>
> Stupid bitch. Where did I say I got it from the USC? That's not a big
> list of things that ARE legal you idiot. Why don't you show me where it
> says that it's illegal?
Why? I *never* said it was, now did I? Try these:
http://www.edhelper.com/ReadingComprehension.htm and then we'll talk, il?
Umm... bitch.

--
RJB
3/28/2005 8:29:52 AM

OK, so what's the speed of dark ?
--Steven Wright

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:03:06 +0800, Bateau wrote:

> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:55:16 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>
>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:43:45 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:47:20 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> RJB <robartle@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:59:06 +0800, Bateau wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>shadows <shadows@whitefang.com> once tried to test me with:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2005-03-20, Knight37 <knight37m@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Free clue: Marvel doesn't have a copyright on superheroes with claws
>>>>>>>>>>>> coming out of their hands.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Free clue: You can't copyright an idea. You copyright
>>>>>>>>>>> expression. In CoH you can create characters that manifest the
>>>>>>>>>>> same expression as a Marvel comic book character.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Yes, but just because you CAN do that, does not mean NCSoft is violating
>>>>>>>>>>Marvel's copyrights. That would be like saying the DVD writer maker is
>>>>>>>>>>responsible for when I make an illegal copy of some movie or game.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In America if something which can be used to infringe on copyright has a
>>>>>>>>> legitimate use it's legal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it did
>>>>>>>>exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>>>>>>>>suing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's the decision that judges have made in probably every single such
>>>>>>> case. Dumbass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It *still* doesn't preclude them from suing. Dumbass.
>>>>>
>>>>> That STILL doesn't make it illegal. Dumbass.
>>>>
>>>>Where did I say it was illegal? Being legal or not does *not* preclude a
>>>>lawsuit. Dumbass.
>>>
>>> When you argued against my statement that it's legal. Dumbass.
>>
>>Well where did you show me the code? Where did I say it was illegal? I
>>said: "I'd love to see the section of USC you got that from. And even if it
>>did exist it still doesn't (or wouldn't) preclude the copyright holder from
>>suing." So just *how* exactly did I argue against it? I said I'd like the
>>see the code. Dumbass.
>
> Stupid bitch. Where did I say I got it from the USC? That's not a big
> list of things that ARE legal you idiot. Why don't you show me where it
> says that it's illegal?
Why? I *never* said it was, now did I? Try these:
http://www.edhelper.com/ReadingComprehension.htm and then we'll talk, ok?
Umm... bitch.

--
RJB
3/28/2005 8:29:52 AM

OK, so what's the speed of dark ?
--Steven Wright

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

Don't forget Wolverines.

I mean blatant copyright infringement, the animal actually uses the same
label!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

Don't forget Wolverines.

I mean blatant copyright infringement, the animal actually uses the same
label!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg (More info?)

Hawklan wrote:

> Don't forget Wolverines.
>
> I mean blatant copyright infringement, the animal actually uses the same
> label!

Or storms or flash (drives) or the cyclops that Homer spoke of or Thor
or .... ;-)