3ogdy
Distinguished
I may not be good with math, but 20 - 25 a week simply doesn't amount to "hundreds every month". It amounts to a hundred at best.
56.53 weeks. From release date of RTX 4090. 56.53*25=1413 failed cards in this service as theoretical maximum.I may not be good with math, but 20 - 25 a week simply doesn't amount to "hundreds every month". It amounts to a hundred at best.
I never said they were. Nvidia is simply part of the system where manufacturers make changes every so often, to increase component sales.Nvidia is not a power supply vendor. Can we please hold down the conspiracy theories?
It is not the wire that is the problem it physical connector. If you read the specs from pci-sig where this connector is defines it requires that each pin be able to carry 9.2 amps which gives you 662 watts at 12 volts. So there is 10% overhead built in.Doing simple math and using a wire gauge chart for low voltage applications shows they connector is deeply flawed. It has no margin baked in for overdraw which a loose connection can cause. Remember when doing that calculation you have to convert smaller wires to their single wire equivalent.
So 450watts at 12v is going to pull 37.5a. Copper at over 60c operational temp needs to be 6 gauge to handle that kind of load. As 8 gauge only leaves you 3 amps of wiggle room and only if your wire temp is over 60c. Wire gauge goes up as operational temps go down as well so you spec over gauge for that. It takes (16) 18 gauge wires to be the equivalent of 6 gauge. Which is the standard size wire for PCIe connectors.
Nvidia in their infinite wisdom thought they could break simple physics. The new 12 pin connector is only using (12) 18 gauge wires instead of the 16 needed to hit the right gauge of wire for their 450w max. Their current spec puts them at 7 gauge not including the smaller 4 sense pins.
They didn't leave any room for their max load while people are seeing some after market cards pulling 600 watts. The connector is woefully under designed. Older cards often had a third 8 pin despite it not being necessary. Which would bring the effective wire size to 4 gauge and they drew a lot less power than 4090s. 3080ti at 350watts draws 29 amps and only requires 8 gauge to have a good margin yet they gave you an effective gauge of 4 with (3) 8 pin connectors.
You can see the stark comaprison to the 4090 which is 1 gauge under its minimum safe wire size and asking 4 tiny wires to pick up the slack. It's no wonder a loose connection is resulting in the temps it is and causing melting of the connector to occur. The wires simply can't handle the amp load much less the extra impedence from a bad connection.
This!the real problem is a GPU that uses too much power
Didn't Steve also tested that sometimes the connector pulls more power from certain cables and not well balanced between all cables?It is not the wire that is the problem it physical connector. If you read the specs from pci-sig where this connector is defines it requires that each pin be able to carry 9.2 amps which gives you 662 watts at 12 volts. So there is 10% overhead built in.
You can assume that all the power supply makers combined know all about wire gauge and know 18 gauge wire can carry the proper current over just 6 12 volt leads.
If the problem was even close to as bad as you imply every single card would immediately burn up. The vast majority of the cards work fine. The wires do not even get warm.
It is all related to the plug for whatever reason sometime not making proper contact. This leads to all that power now trying to flow over fewer pins and it exceeds the 9.2 amps rating of one or more of the pins.
That's the issue w/ parallel conductor LVHC:Didn't Steve also tested that sometimes the connector pulls more power from certain cables and not well balanced between all cables?
Sure, but it's still not hundreds of GPUs a month.56.53 weeks. From release date of RTX 4090. 56.53*25=1413 failed cards in this service as theoretical maximum.
Perhaps the title is a little too much. When it specifically applies to this electronics repair shop only. If we zoom in to the size of the planet, maybe the monthly number is 10000? The number is a completely arbitrary guess as there is no public data from any other service.Sure, but it's still not hundreds of GPUs a month.
As for the question as why people do X vs Y, why do you think IQ tests exist?The RTX 4090 came out 13 months ago. AFAIK all 4090s have at least 12 months of warranty; many have more, e.g. those bought direct from Nvidia have 3 years.
So is this guy getting all these damaged cards just from people who bought 4090s in the first month it was out, and models with the shortest warranty? Oris he dealing specifically with people who have done something to void their warranty? Something about this doesn't quite add up.
Edit: On 2nd thought, he implies he has been fixing these for some time, so he must have been dealing with cards that are within their warranty period. Why would these people be sending their cards to independent repair shops while they're still under warranty?
Since when has Gamers Nexus repaired RTX 4000 series GPU's?I wouldn't pay this dude too much mind. He's just out to drive clicks to his site and promote himself. He's been posting 4090 videos for a while and been called out by Gamers Nexus for misleading data in his videos. Most of his videos just look like informercials for himself. Everyone else is wrong, everyone else does terrible work. Only I know the truth and how to fix things. One of them he actually holds up a 4080 PCB and calls it a 4090. He wants to call out everyone else but can't identify a 4080 vs a 4090 PCB that he's holding?
Here you are expressing the theory vs the reality, respecting the nature of which reality works.. example it is stupid to do it just to say, hey look what cool think I did as a manufacturer.I never said they were. Nvidia is simply part of the system where manufacturers make changes every so often, to increase component sales.
I do like the idea of making the power connector part of the card and motherboard, so no more cables to the GPU are needed. I think that is a real improvement.
But replacing 3 individual connectors with a single connector, that's just silly.
which is exactly what Nvidia should do as well.I have seen videos of wires and plugs melting on these cards and as i was planning on getting a new rig built i contacted the company who was going to build the rig for me. They said they were aware of the problem and they throw away the cables that come with the card and out source replacements as they are better quality.
They took the decision to do this because if the cards cause a rig to fail they would be legally obliged to repair or replace everything they got damaged.
Like what, in this context? the only benefit I can see would be a new RTX 4090 whenever it melts, but that is a hassle having to RMA it.Hey, living on the edge has its benefits.
For one dude is still a lot.Sure, but it's still not hundreds of GPUs a month.
Anyone remembers the fire & melting video card PCIE VGA riser extension cable?I have seen videos of wires and plugs melting on these cards and as i was planning on getting a new rig built i contacted the company who was going to build the rig for me. They said they were aware of the problem and they throw away the cables that come with the card and out source replacements as they are better quality.
They took the decision to do this because if the cards cause a rig to fail they would be legally obliged to repair or replace everything they got damaged.
I wonder if they would send you only refurbished instead of new XDLike what, in this context? the only benefit I can see would be a new RTX 4090 whenever it melts, but that is a hassle having to RMA it.
Here you are expressing the theory vs the reality, respecting the nature of which reality works.. example it is stupid to do it just to say, hey look what cool think I did as a manufacturer.
The only changes made for 12V-2x6 are to shorten/retract the sense pins, such that they are last contact/first break. How does that help with anything other than improperly seated connectors?That's not the argument. The initial design of the new connector caused notably higher rates of failure than the old 6/8 pin. Further, a few relatively simple changes to the new design resolved some very obvious shortcomings in that initial design. The changes are not limited to helping just with improperly seated connectors. That said, your assertion that improperly seated connectors are automatically user error is false. The initial design is bad enough that improperly seating can more easily happen.