10tacle writes:
> o/c SB 2500k. Sure, the 4770/1150 platform is a worthy upgrade to my SB,
> especially as one who wants to move up to i7 for video editing, ...
If video editing is your main task, a better upgrade would be SB-E, or
IB-E *if* it hasn't been hamstrung with the same silly cap material as IB.
Grandmastersexsay writes:
> ... Why didn't you try with an NH-D14? ...
One shouldn't have to use something as over the top as a D14 to oc a chip.
That's complete overkill. Even an old used TRUE is enough to run a 2600K
at 5GHz.
> ... All these things might need is some better thermal paste like Ivy Bridge.
*All* they need?? Presumably you're ok with trashing your warranty and the
much higher chance of damaging the chip compared to the comparatively easier
'enthusiast' task of lapping a chip.
> Haswell will be a great upgrade over a 775. ...
Of course it will, but so would a used 2500K, cheap TRUE, couple of fans,
4.7GHz in 3 minutes with a typical Z68 board. No way on earth haswell offers
anything really useful beyond this for the vast majority of users. And just
spend the amount saved on a better GPU or whatever.
> ... The $330 I7 4770K and $230 I5 4670K will be the fastest single threaded
> processor available, ...
The differences are not statistically significant most of the time. Merely
using an SSD or not could negate any visible difference. And since older CPUs
oc better, it's entirely possible overall performance with a Haswell oc'd using
the same parts would be worse.
> ... and at around
> half the cost of the $590 I7 3930K Sandy Bridge-E. ...
SB-E is an excellent chip *if* one can make use of the extra cores. And it
oc's very nicely too.
> ... As hyper threading really doesn't help with games, ...
That depends on the game/task; some games do benefit. For those that don't,
then again SB is a winner with the 2500K.
> ... Now is a great time to upgrade, ...
Sure, but I wouldn't bother with Haswell. I still think the sweetspot is
a used 2500K. Or even new if one can find them for a sensible price, but
of course Intel doesn't want its older chips being sold at all, or if they
are then the prices are really high despite being old. Are you suggesting
that the 2500K wouldn't absolutely fly off the shelves if it was still
available new for a sensibly low price? And imagine if one could by an
adjusted 2500K so it could fit into S1150? It's blatantly obvious that
Intel is dragging its heels now; reading your comments if feels like you're
praising Intel for winning a race in which they were the only competitor.
GIJoeMyGoodness writes:
> ... Ivy get's more done with a lower frequency and my i7-3770K is running
> 4.5Ghz on air. ...
To which I'm sure those with 2600K/2700K setups would say, *only* 4.5?
And that's the point. Without a very risky cap mod and no warranty,
SB oc's far better, and no need for crazy cooling.
tnagy writes:
> I have i7 920 OC to 3.8 should I upgrade?
That depends on what you're doing. What are your main tasks? Is it games?
Some are more CPU-dependent, others less so. Are are you running pro apps
or other non-gaming tasks? Do you benefit from lots of cores? Are you on
a restricted budget? Would you consider buying 2nd-hand for better value?
One can't answer a question like that without a lot more info.
Plenty of people will slag off your system for being 'old' in all sorts
of ways, but don't believe the hype. Unless your main task matches the
kind of upgrade you're considering, you may see a far lower performance
improvement than others will imply. If you don't already have one, the
best change to make in general is to fit an SSD (250GB Samsung 840 is good,
doesn't cost much).
ko300zx writes:
> ... but now I think I'll just grab a 3570k, and save the $100. ...
Or buy a used 2500K, it will oc much better, faster in overall terms;
spend the cash saved on a better GPU or SSD, etc.
TheMadFapper writes:
> How is this disappointing? ...
Because for a chip that requires a new mbd, new socket and uprated PSU,
it offers little or nothing over previous generation products.
> ... You people act
> like IB/SB is slow. ...
It isn't usefully *better*, that's the point, despite all the hype.
> ... Did we really need a significantly faster processor? ...
For a new socket/mbd/PSU, YES!
> ... I wouldn't have even released the Haswell desktop processors, ...
That indeed would have been a better approach, but Intel didn't do that;
instead they released a product which is expensive to adopt, offers
little in the way of gains over SB/IB, and with higher base pricing than
we've ever seen before (prices here are crazy). Very disappointing indeed.
I'm half-tempted to bag a newer AMD one of these days just to gain a feel
for something different as regards oc'ing, platform behaviour, etc., even
though I know it won't show any kind of comparative performance edge over
anything I already have (4.7 i3 550, 4.2 i7 870, 4.3 i7 875K, 5.0 2500K,
5.0 2700K, 4.7 3930K, 4.4 i5 760, some not yet setup including i5 670,
990X, another 870 and several more i3 550s). Just tired of waiting for
Intel to make something worthy of an enthusiast spend.
Ian.