The Most Promising Tech of 2010

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
[citation][nom]gsacks[/nom]I top 10 would have been better. You guys really reached to get to 33. A portable hard drive! Really ?!?[/citation]how else could they put the iPad in the list of top anything? Write it down, the iPad is the #1 lamest tech of 2010.
 
RCA airnergy is a hoax.... it cant create enough energy out of wireless signals..
basics why not explained here http://www.joewein.net/blog/2010/01/14/rca-airnergy-looks-like-a-hoax/
 
Meh, i've never like the idea of project natal. Perhaps i'm very closed minded, but i only play FPS with the exception of a few MMOs. So i really can't see how i'd use and enjoy this effectively, without feeling like a complete pratt around my family. It is interesting however, but not one of the things i am excited about.

 
[citation][nom]nforce4max[/nom]I would love to have that 152in plasma TV and in the old family house there is certainly room for this monster being the house is the old southern or Victorian style.[/citation]
hopefully with 2 - 4' french doors, otherwise good luck getting it inside, much less if you have to go around a corner. "Ya, im re-modeling so I can get my new tv trhough the front door"
 
While I agree that Apple will make the iPad big, I was kind of saddened that it seemed to be about as good in terms of hardware as every other product on the market.
 
The m11x is the coolest tech of Q1. R.A.T. looks really cool and so does that Panasonic plasma.

p.s. Pornstar Legend? When did pornstars become legends!?
 
The most exciting slide for me is the Skiff. I look forward to the day where I can read something in a restaurant and spill my drink all over my reader without worry. It needs to be tough enough that I can stuff it into my briefcase without scratching it.

Perhaps Samsung's transparent OLED combined with the upcoming 3D technology will finally give us a Star Wars inspired 3d display for admiring Death Star schematics.

I wish my house was big enough to fit that Panasonic 152" plasma. That would be awesome!

I think the Intel wireless display standard will be popular if they make it easy and cheap enough. However, tying it to a particular chipset will slow its adoption. It will be better to have a little card or device that you plug into your laptop or pc that communicates with the TV or receiver box.
 
[citation][nom]tuannguyen[/nom]Nothing ironic about it really. I said originally that I felt the iPad is gimped. I still feel the same about it--but it doesn't change what's inevitable.As time has proven again and again, not all superior products are successful. Often, the inferior devices with great marketing are the ones to dominate. That was my point here./ Tuan[/citation]

Like bluray right?
 
[citation][nom]Lewis57[/nom]Meh, i've never like the idea of project natal. Perhaps i'm very closed minded, but i only play FPS with the exception of a few MMOs. So i really can't see how i'd use and enjoy this effectively, without feeling like a complete pratt around my family. It is interesting however, but not one of the things i am excited about.[/citation]

yeah also, the delay looks like a bitch.

no edit?
 
Yay SONY SD cards.... unfortunatly I have stopped buying SONY items with the exception of SONY PS3games. many of my previous phones including the P1i were Sony but they have broken or I have moved on. My P1i touchscreen broke on me. It has been about a year since SOny had decided to stop producing m2 and their memory stick cards. These new SD cards are probably overpriced if its coming from SONY. I wonder if they are improved over other vendors like kingston, ect.

Anyway there are so many of these tech items that are great concepts but how many will actually become a standard, we will see as some are actually direct competitors. The dual table from MSI sounds great but they should make it thinner as ppl could use it like a real book or paper rather than the oled paper thin reader.....

 
two words should be more than enough to turn anyone off this product: Mad Catz
 
Also, it's not like they just charge you more because they feel like it. Sure, it costs less to manufacture the new LED screens, but take into account the fact that the manufacturers have to get new equipment to build these screens. It's not as cheap as you might think.
 
[citation][nom]tuannguyen[/nom]Nothing ironic about it really. I said originally that I felt the iPad is gimped. I still feel the same about it--but it doesn't change what's inevitable.As time has proven again and again, not all superior products are successful. Often, the inferior devices with great marketing are the ones to dominate. That was my point here./ Tuan[/citation]

Well said. Take the Wii as an example.
 
The RCA wifi charger is a fraud. It is not possible to draw enough power from wireless signals to charge batteries in anything less than months.
 
There's no doubt about it: LED -based- +backlit+ LCD-s- +panels+ are going to replace -aging- +cold+ cathode +fluorescent+lamp+(CCFL)+backlit+ LCD panels.

When LCD displays first came out, they were herald+ed+ as the wave of the future. By today's standards -however-, -even-traditional- +CCFL+ LCD displays seem thick and bulky -by-comparison-. LED +backlit+LCD displays grant you better picture contrast, -faster-response-time(statement-is-incorrect),- more uniform-ed-(the-colors-are-wearing-uniforms?)-color,- thinner products, and greater power savings.

OLED and AMOLED displays are promising, but they're still too expensive. LED +backlit+LCD+ displays are -actually- cheaper to make than traditional panels -on-the-same-scale-, but +there+is+ still +a+ cost -a- premium. Expect prices on LED +backlit+LCD+ displays and TVs to be slashed heavily this year.

Thin is in, baby.
 
Gee, some of this was 2009 tech. Some of it was announced, but we won't see until 2011. Some of it was blah, and some of it was all hype and no substance.

Hot technologies of 2010? Here's my list:
- iPad. For all the negative press, it is $400 less than expected, and not a bad device at all, especially if Apple gets jumpy with the pricing and makes the $799 model slide closer to the $499, and drops the $130 3G premium to something more reasonable like $50. More so if they do release, as expected, a bluetooth camera adapter and wireless HDMI at 720p or better (the chip in it can actually do 1080p). If they do all this, the eee keyboard will be too little too late unless it's under $299.
- Some new set top box that turns any-old HDTV into everything they're advertising about "Internet connected" TVs. A hot new AppleTV/Boxee clone under $200, better if it doubles as a DVR.
- iPhone 4
- iPhone OS 4
- wireless external GPUs
- an iPod shuffle revamp, adds a screen and a GPS tracker, and syncs with iPhone/iPad apps (the perfect biker/runner/day hiker accessory).
 
[citation][nom]reynod[/nom]So get some more information out to us soon guys ...I agree ipad looks to be a fizzer - all locked up, no expansion, no phone or webcam ... it could have been an awesome videophone to start with ... instead its a halfbaked toy. No recharegeable batteries either.[/citation]

All locked up? It's unlocked by default from providers, has far looser App store restrictions (fewer native apps to clash with), and there's 150,000 apps and a whole new GUI to play with. The only think that's locked is there's a single marketplace, but ANYONE is welcome to play there (unless you hock porn or illegal apps, in which case unlocking is easy and apps are available).

Expansion? Who cares really. The CLOUD is your expansion. The internal storage is only required for your daily when-not-otherwise-connected need, everything else is streamed. 32GB is more than enough local storage...

No phone? You missed the reviews. The SDK does have a full phone interface, VoIP apps are fully approved over 3G, and it tethers with your existing phone anyway... It need not have it's own Phone plan (and why would you want to add it as a line anyway!?!?) Your phone rings, you click on the iPad screen to answer, and talk through bluetooth as you allways would, or it's internal mic and speakers... You are simply just misinformed on this count.

Webcam? Think about it, if there's a cam on the bezel, where would it point when it's on your lap??? You'd have to hold it at arms length to talk, and the video would shake all over for the poor sap on the otehr end since building in hardware motion canceling is impossible in a 3mm think camera lens (thus far). Also, which bezel should it go on? Should it face forward, back, both? A bluetooth camera stack exists, and a clip-on one, bluetooth cameras are $50. For the 20% of people who might actually video chat, I'd much rather have a small, detachable, more useful camera that integrated with the software than have one built in that I have to pay for but would never realistically use. This is one reason it;s $499 starting, not $899, suck it up!

Rechargible battery? You must have meant "replaceable." First off, wtf cares. it plays video for 10+ hours streamed over WiFi. It has a 30 fucking day standby time. It;s a LiPo battery with a 5,000 charge lifecycle. By the time the battery gives out from age, the device will be useless anyway, and be replaced by a much more powerful $200 device. Also, that battery you want, you realize that's probably a $120 LiPo battery pack, right? That you'd never have charged anyway when you needed it? And exactly when do you plan to play video for more than 10 straight hours (or read an ebook for 20 hours) where you could not find a USB port or wall outlet for 30 minutes to recharge?

you're beating up a device over not-included features that are either completely irrelevent, or only required by a small percentage of buyers (and which ARE available to those buyers), simply because you lack all reasonable imagination of what this device is for.

The iPad is NOT a computer, it;s a COMPANION computing device. NO, it does not run a full OS. I DO NOT WANT IT TO, because then I;d have to CARE FOR IT as if it did, it would not be instant on, it would not be easy to use, and I'd argue why I'd not just have a real PC for a couple hundred more. The iPad is a very light, hermetically sealed, always-on, always receiving notifications and alerts, media powerhouse and game platform. It's an INSTANT GRATIFICATION and CONVENIENCE platform, not a computer, not an e-book reader, and not a phone. It goes WITH your phone and your PC, and does not replace either. If you had clue one about how it might actually fit into life, you'd realize quickly this is going to revolutionize how you spend your free time, how you get media to your TV, how you interact with people and the web, and more. It is not about the hardware, it's about the CONVERGENCE of technology and media. THAT is what is revolutionary, and that's what all you idiots missed. You just don't get it, and I fear you never will.

(sorry for the rant, nothing personal, just sick of haterz and FUD already).
 
LED performs better since you don't have to have them on all the time. If you notice when a black screen is shown on a traditional LCD you can see the lighting still on. Where on LED the back lighting is off which makes the blacks blacker leading to a better contrast ratio.
 
Yes, but very few LED lit screens actually use a grid of LED's

about 90%(maybe i over exaggerate here) or ALL current LED displays have led bars on the side with a light tube/diffuser to pump/guide light into the back of the screen. This is how they make screens so thin.

If anyone has a link to a LCD screen with and LED grid back lighting(full-array backlighting), please post it.

Point of my post, I would rather have a CFL lit LCD with a nice PVA or IPS panel then a LED lit TN screen any day.

EDIT, A Sony video on LCD back lighting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECfJ9JRvHLY
 
The only real things of interest to me were the newer display technologies and possibly the no touch touch if it was available for PC's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.