[citation][nom]coolvoodoo[/nom]I like the ATI vs Nvidia wars because that is what drives progress, but it seems that some people want any benchmarks where the Nvidia card is faster to be removed. What would that prove? It is funny that the commenters above seem to think that when ATI performs better, it is because of the card, and when Nvidia performs better it is because they "paid off Tom's". That just seems like fanboys spouting off. I admit that I still like to see how any graphics card performs in Crysis because:1. It still taxes even the mightiest of cards.2. Every comparison for the past few years has used it, thus giving me an idea how my current card performs against the new cards.3. Someday I want to own a graphics card that can beat it down.4. I actually still play Crysis (and Far Cry 2).[/citation]
I never suggested anyone paying off TH but what these guys are talking about might express their desire (mine included) to balance the benchmark suite as most of the games are Nvidia's titles (the way it's meant to be played).This results in Shifting the overall judgement. I respect ATI/AMD more than Nvidia or Intel (that's just a gut feeling nothing more) because it keeps struggling no matter what happens.