I've noticed that different Thermal Interface Materials have different directions for use. Some call for a small dob in the middle of the heatspreader, other a line across the cores, while still others should be spread evenly over the CPU.
I'm a blob-in-the-middle guy, reasoning that the pressure of the heatsink will spread the material out evenly anyway. Those were the directions that came with my AS-5. Why would that not work with TX-2 (which calls for spreading)?
Could it have something to do with the fact the TX-2 is packaged with the Sunbeam Core Contact Freezer, which contacts the heatpipes directly with the CPU heatspreader, and the TIM easily slips into the cracks between the pipes? If that's the reason then, it would depend on the heatsink rather than the TIM.
What are your thoughts on the issue? Should there be one method for all, or does it depend on the heatsink? Could each TIM really be so different that they require a different application method regardless of heatsink?
I'm a blob-in-the-middle guy, reasoning that the pressure of the heatsink will spread the material out evenly anyway. Those were the directions that came with my AS-5. Why would that not work with TX-2 (which calls for spreading)?
Could it have something to do with the fact the TX-2 is packaged with the Sunbeam Core Contact Freezer, which contacts the heatpipes directly with the CPU heatspreader, and the TIM easily slips into the cracks between the pipes? If that's the reason then, it would depend on the heatsink rather than the TIM.
What are your thoughts on the issue? Should there be one method for all, or does it depend on the heatsink? Could each TIM really be so different that they require a different application method regardless of heatsink?